首页> 外文OA文献 >Dating the Kawakawa/Oruanui eruption: Comment on 'Optical luminescence dating of a loess section containing a critical tephra marker horizon, SW North Island of New Zealand' by R. Grapes et al.
【2h】

Dating the Kawakawa/Oruanui eruption: Comment on 'Optical luminescence dating of a loess section containing a critical tephra marker horizon, SW North Island of New Zealand' by R. Grapes et al.

机译:川川/奥拉努伊火山喷发的年代:R。Grapes等人评论“黄土剖面的光学发光年代法,该剖面包含一个重要的特弗拉标记层,新西兰西南部岛”。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An IRSL age of 17.0 ± 2.2 ka (and a “mean age” of ca. 19 ka) reported by Grapes et al. [Grapes, R., Rieser, U., Wang, N. Optical luminescence dating of a loess section containing a critical tephra marker horizon, SW North Island of New Zealand. Quaternary Geochronology 5(2-3), 164–169.] for the Kawakawa/Oruanui tephra, and other ages associated with a loess section in New Zealand are untenable: age data presented are inconsistent, no formal statistical treatments or error determinations were undertaken in age analysis, and the ages proposed are seriously at odds with multiple radiocarbon age determinations on tephra sequences bracketing the Kawakawa/Oruanui tephra and with palaeoenvironmental evidence elsewhere for the time period concerned. We suggest that the bulk polymineral IRSL ages on the tephra and encapsulating loess deposits were underestimated in part because of contamination of the loess by the integration of younger materials during slow deposition and continuous modification by upbuilding pedogenesis. Single-grain luminescence assays may reveal such contamination. A 14C-based age of ca. 27 ± 1 ka cal BP (2σ), reported in 2008, currently remains the best estimate for the age of eruption of the Kawakawa/Oruanui tephra.
机译:Grapes等报道,IRSL年龄为17.0±2.2 ka(“平均年龄”为19 ka)。 [Grapes,R.,Rieser,U.,Wang,N。黄土段的光学发光测年,该段黄土含有重要的特弗拉标记层,新西兰西南岛。川川/ Oruanui特非拉的第四纪年代学,第5(2-3)期,第164–169页],以及与新西兰黄土剖面相关的其他年龄是站不住脚的:提供的年龄数据不一致,未进行正式的统计处理或错误确定在年龄分析中,建议的年龄与将川河/奥鲁努伊特弗拉括起来的特弗拉序列的多个放射性碳年龄确定以及有关时间段的其他古环境证据严重不一致。我们建议,低估了特发草和包封的黄土沉积物上的多矿物IRSL年龄,部分原因是缓慢沉积过程中年轻物质的整合以及通过改良成岩作用的持续修饰,对黄土的污染。单颗粒发光测定法可能会发现这种污染。基于14C的年龄。 2008年报道的27±1 ka cal BP(2σ)目前仍是川川/奥鲁努伊特非拉火山喷发年龄的最佳估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号