首页> 外文OA文献 >International trade negotiations and the trans-border movement of people: A review of the literature
【2h】

International trade negotiations and the trans-border movement of people: A review of the literature

机译:国际贸易谈判与人员的跨境流动:文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We review the international and New Zealand literatures on the two-way interaction between international migration and agreements designed to enhance cross-border trade or investment. Benefits and costs of migration, to the extent that these may feature in trade and migration negotiations, are discussed. While trade and migration can be substitutes in some contexts, they will be complements in other contexts. Liberalisation of services and the movement of people are likely to offer much more significant gains than liberalisation of remaining barriers to goods trade. Significant scope for liberalisation under GATS mode 4 (the movement of natural persons) may remain. However, temporary migration is already promoted on a unilateral and bilateral basis within immigration policy frameworks that may provide greater flexibility than GATS mode 4. With respect to both trade and migration, the more diverse the exchanging countries are, the greater the economic benefits tend to be. However, greater diversity may also imply greater social costs. This paradox of diversity needs to be addressed through appropriate social policies accompanying enhanced temporary and permanent migration.
机译:我们回顾了有关国际移徙与旨在加强跨境贸易或投资的协定之间双向互动的国际和新西兰文献。讨论了在贸易和移民谈判中可能体现的移民收益和成本。尽管在某些情况下贸易和移民可以替代,但在其他情况下它们将是补充。服务的自由化和人员的流动可能比放开剩余的货物贸易壁垒带来更大的收益。在GATS模式4下(自然人的流动),自由化的范围可能仍然很大。但是,在移民政策框架内已经在单边和双边基础上促进了临时移民,这可能比《服贸总协定》模式4具有更大的灵活性。就贸易和移民而言,交换国家越多样化,经济利益往往就越大。是。但是,更大的多样性也可能意味着更高的社会成本。这种多样性悖论需要通过适当的社会政策来解决,同时应加强临时和永久移民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号