首页> 外文OA文献 >An Integration of a Process Approach and Formative Assessment into the Development of Teaching and Learning of ESL Writing in a Malaysian University: A Sociocultural Perspective
【2h】

An Integration of a Process Approach and Formative Assessment into the Development of Teaching and Learning of ESL Writing in a Malaysian University: A Sociocultural Perspective

机译:社会文化视角下的马来西亚大学英语写作教学发展中的过程方法和形成性评估的整合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A review of relevant literature indicates that assessment of students’ academic writing needs to include formative as well as summative feedback, especially when process approaches to the teaching of writing are adopted. However, in Malaysia, assessment is perceived as mainly for grading purposes and the teaching and learning of academic writing are firmly based on a product approach. The present study took the form of a collaborative action research project intended to consider the extent to which elements of process writing and formative assessment could be introduced, from a sociocultural perspective, into the normal classrooms of two Malaysian ESL teachers and 48 learners at a selected Malaysian university.This project was carried out in three phases. Phase 1 gathered documentary and interview data on current issues pertaining to ESL writing assessment practices in Malaysian tertiary classrooms. Phase 2 was carried out through two action research cycles during which a formative assessment intervention was introduced in classroom teaching. Interviews in Phase 3 were conducted to discover the immediate and long-term impacts of this action research project on teachers’ beliefs and subsequent pedagogical and learning development. The data from documents, interviews, classroom observations, briefing and feedback sessions were subjected to a process of grounded analysis. From the analysis, categories and themes were generated and structured to address to the research questions formulated for this research.The present study suggests that process writing is more meaningful to the learners when formative assessment is incorporated into the teaching of ESL writing. It allows more opportunities for ESL learners to gain feedback and feed forward from both teachers and peers. Through feedback and feed forward, learners were given an opportunity to develop their understanding based not only on their previous mistakes but also on the new input to improve their writing. In addition, the use of feedback and feed forward helped both teachers and learners learn to view assessment in a positive way. However, it was evident that any intention to integrate curricular innovations, such as formative assessment and process writing, must acknowledge the institutional and sociocultural contexts of the participants, and thus be tailored to fit in with normal pedagogical activity.The findings of this study were viewed through the lens of sociocultural theory. By interpreting the implications of the study in terms of mediation, scaffolding and regulation, the basic construct of a Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) was refined to formulate a specific zone of writing development (zwd). This is intended to shed light on the actual means by which learners can be enabled to perform written tasks with structured guidance so that they can eventually do similar tasks without assistance.The overall results of this study contribute to the contemporary debates in Malaysia about alternatives to current assessment practice. Closing the gap between teaching and assessment, through the integration of formative assessment and process writing, within a basically product approach, is intended to be the main contribution of this research. The study makes a contribution to the areas of both writing instruction and writing research. Blending the existing practices with elements of process writing and formative assessment highlights the usefulness of peer review activity within a ZPD through the practice of scaffolding. Also, this study adds to the importance of doing action research collaboratively and in a collegial manner, with a longitudinal perspective. Although the setting of the research was in Malaysia, the findings of the study could provide guidelines for research elsewhere, the collaborative approach to action research applied in other contexts, and appropriate modification of the ZPD (in this case, a zwd) could be applied to enhance the teaching of other skills.
机译:对相关文献的回顾表明,对学生学术写作的评估需要包括形成性反馈和总结性反馈,尤其是在采用写作教学的过程方法时。但是,在马来西亚,评估被认为主要用于评分目的,而学术写作的教与学完全基于产品方法。本研究采取合作行动研究项目的形式,旨在考虑从社会文化的角度将过程写作和形成性评估的要素引入多位马来西亚两名ESL教师和48名学习者的正常教室的程度马来西亚大学。该项目分三个阶段进行。第1阶段收集了有关马来西亚大教室中与ESL写作评估实践有关的当前问题的文献和访谈数据。第二阶段是通过两个行动研究周期进行的,在此阶段,在课堂教学中引入了形成性评估干预措施。在第3阶段进行了访谈,以发现此行动研究项目对教师的信念以及随后的教学和学习发展的近期和长期影响。来自文档,访谈,课堂观察,简报和反馈会议的数据经过了扎实的分析过程。通过分析,可以生成类别和主题并对其进行结构化,以解决针对本研究提出的研究问题。本研究表明,将形成性评估纳入ESL写作教学中,过程写作对学习者更有意义。它为ESL学习者提供了更多的机会,以获取反馈并从老师和同伴那里获得反馈。通过反馈和前馈,学习者不仅有机会根据先前的错误,而且有机会基于新的输入来发展自己的理解,以提高他们的写作水平。此外,使用反馈和前馈有助于教师和学习者以积极的方式学习评估。但是,很明显,任何旨在整合课程创新的意向,例如形成性评估和过程写作,都必须承认参与者的制度和社会文化背景,并因此要进行调整以适合正常的教学活动。从社会文化理论的角度来看。通过在调解,脚手架和调节方面解释本研究的意义,对近端发育区(ZPD)的基本结构进行了改进,以制定特定的写作发育区(zwd)。这旨在阐明使学习者能够在结构化指导下执行书面任务的实际方法,从而使他们最终无需协助即可完成类似的任务。这项研究的总体结果促进了马来西亚当代有关替代品的争论。当前的评估实践。通过在基本的产品方法内整合形成性评估和过程编写来弥合教学与评估之间的鸿沟,将是本研究的主要贡献。该研究为写作指导和写作研究领域做出了贡献。将现有实践与流程编写和形成性评估的要素相结合,突出显示了通过脚手架实践在ZPD中进行同行评审活动的有用性。此外,这项研究还增加了以纵向视角进行协作并以大学方式进行行动研究的重要性。尽管研究的背景是在马来西亚,但是研究的结果可以为其他地方的研究提供指导,在其他情况下应用行动研究的协作方法,并且可以对ZPD(在这种情况下,称为zwd)进行适当的修改增强其他技能的教学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hasim Zuwati;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号