首页> 外文OA文献 >Not a Fair Go: A History and Analysis of Social Credit's Struggle for Success in New Zealand's Electoral System
【2h】

Not a Fair Go: A History and Analysis of Social Credit's Struggle for Success in New Zealand's Electoral System

机译:不公平:社会信用在新西兰选举制度中的成功斗争的历史与分析

摘要

This thesis is an examination of the main issues Social Credit contended with while trying to succeed in New Zealand politics. Its historical and political analysis is in the context of the electoral system.The first section argues for and describes the changing electoral context and outlines how this created difficulties for Social Credit. It concludes that the movement faced very adverse electoral periods for third parties. The second part examines founder Major C.H. Douglas's Social Credit vision and charts Social Credit's political adaptations from its New Zealand beginnings to the time Bruce Beetham took over as leader in 1972. It challenges the myths that Social Credit could not change without ceasing to be Social Credit and that its economics were unworkable.In the third section the centrality of Beetham's leadership to Social Credit success is explored by looking at his life, personality, beliefs and vision for the movement. It concludes that he believed in Social Credit and that his drive and dedication were essential to Social Credit's revival. Then the thesis follows Social Credit's electoral progress from 1972 to 1981. It examines the impact from its own activities and other political actors and circumstances. This includes effects from organisational changes, the effect of growing and changing membership and the sources of its votes. The fifth part outlines the factors that put Social Credit into permanent decline after 1981. These include the Clyde dam issue, the emerging New Zealand party, the 1984 snap election and the failure to revitalise the party. Finally, it examines Social Credit influence on the electoral system itself, particularly in regard to the move to proportional representation. Here its existence and size mattered more than direct action.The contribution of this thesis is, firstly, in challenging the usual roles assigned to third parties. Second, it outlines the characteristics of different electoral periods. Third, it examines the nature of Social Credit in a more positive way. Fourth, it looks at the electoral elements that shaped Social Credit's successes and failures. Finally, it shows the effects of professionalisation on a typical party branch.
机译:本文是对试图在新西兰政治中取得成功时社会信用所面临的主要问题的研究。它的历史和政治分析是在选举制度的背景下进行的。第一部分论述并描述了不断变化的选举环境,并概述了这如何给社会信用造成了困难。结论是,该运动面临着非常不利的第三方选举时期。第二部分考察创始人C.H. Major道格拉斯(Douglas)的“社会信用”构想和图表描绘了社会信用从新西兰开始到1972年布鲁斯·比瑟姆(Bruce Beetham)接任领导人之前的政治改编。它挑战了一个神话,即社会信用不能不成为社会信用就不能改变,而且其经济学是行不通的。在第三部分中,通过观察他的生活,个性,信念​​和运动愿景,探索了比瑟姆领导层对社会信用成功的中心地位。结论是他相信社会信用,并且他的努力和奉献对于社会信用的复兴至关重要。然后,论文遵循了社会信用社从1972年到1981年的选举进展。它考察了社会信用社自身活动以及其他政治角色和情况的影响。这包括来自组织变革的影响,成员不断增长和变化的影响以及其投票来源。第五部分概述了使社会信用在1981年后永久下降的因素。这些因素包括克莱德水坝问题,新兴的新西兰政党,1984年的大选和未能振兴该党。最后,它研究了社会信用对选举系统本身的影响,特别是在向比例代表制转变方面。在这里,它的存在和规模比直接行动更重要。本论文的贡献在于,首先是挑战了分配给第三方的通常角色。其次,它概述了不同选举时期的特征。第三,它以更积极的方式考察了社会信用的性质。第四,它考察了塑造社会信用的成败的选举要素。最后,它显示了专业化对典型的党支部的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Calderwood David James;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号