首页> 外文OA文献 >Macrofossils and pollen representing forests of the pre-Taupo volcanic eruption (c. 1850 yr BP) era at Pureora and Benneydale, central North Island, New Zealand.
【2h】

Macrofossils and pollen representing forests of the pre-Taupo volcanic eruption (c. 1850 yr BP) era at Pureora and Benneydale, central North Island, New Zealand.

机译:代表化石和花粉的大化石和花粉,位于新西兰北岛中部的Pureora和Benneydale,建于陶波火山爆发前(约1850年)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Micro- and macrofossil data from the remains of forests overwhelmed and buried at Pureora and Benneydale during the Taupo eruption (c. 1850 conventional radiocarbon yr BP) were compared. Classification of relative abundance data separated the techniques, rather than the locations, because the two primary clusters comprised pollen and litter/wood. This indicates that the pollen:litter/wood within-site comparisons (Pureora and Benneydale are 20 km apart) are not reliable. Plant macrofossils represented mainly local vegetation, while pollen assemblages represented a combination of local and regional vegetation. However, using ranked abundance and presence/absence data, both macrofossils and pollen at Pureora and Benneydale indicated conifer/broadleaved forest, of similar forest type and species composition at each site. This suggests that the forests destroyed by the eruption were typical of mid-altitude west Taupo forests, and that either data set (pollen or macrofossils) would have been adequate for regional forest interpretation.The representation of c. 1850 yr BP pollen from the known buried forest taxa was generally consistent with trends determined by modern comparisons between pollen and their source vegetation, but with a few exceptions.A pollen profile from between the Mamaku Tephra (c. 7250 yr BP) and the Taupo Ignimbrite indicated that the Benneydale forest had been markedly different in species dominance compared with the forest that was destroyed during the Taupo eruption. These differences probably reflect changes in drainage, and improvements in climate and/or soil fertility over the middle Holocene.
机译:比较了在陶波火山喷发期间(约1850年的常规放射性碳yr BP)在Pureora和Benneydale淹没和掩埋的森林残骸中的微化石和大型化石数据。相对丰度数据的分类将技术而不是位置分开,因为两个主要类包括花粉和凋落物/木材。这表明现场内部的花粉:凋落物/木材比较(Pureora和Benneydale相距20 km)是不可靠的。植物大化石主要代表局部植被,而花粉组合代表局部和区域植被的组合。但是,使用排名的丰度和存在/不存在数据,Pureora和Benneydale的大型化石和花粉都表明针叶树/阔叶林,每个站点的森林类型和物种组成相似。这表明被喷发破坏的森林是中西部陶波中海拔森林的典型特征,并且无论是数据集(花粉还是大型化石)都足以用于区域性森林解释。 1850年来自已知掩埋森林类群的BP花粉与通过对花粉及其来源植被进行现代比较而确定的趋势基本一致,但有一些例外情况来自Mamaku Tephra(约7250年BP)和Taupo之间Ignimbrite指出,与在陶波火山喷发期间被破坏的森林相比,本尼代尔森林的物种优势明显不同。这些差异可能反映了全新世中期排水的变化以及气候和/或土壤肥力的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号