首页> 外文OA文献 >The Uses of Analogies in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Science
【2h】

The Uses of Analogies in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Science

机译:类比在十七和十八世纪科学中的用途

摘要

The object of this paper is to look at the extent and nature of the uses of analogy during the first century following the so-called scientific revolution.Using the research tool provided by JSTOR we systematically analyze the uses of “analog” and its cognates (analogies, analogous, etc.) in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London for the period 1665–1780. In addition to giving the possibility of evaluating quantitatively the proportion of papers explicitly using analogies, this approach makes it possible to go beyond the maybe idiosyncratic cases of Descartes, Kepler, Galileo, and other much studied giants of the so-called Scientific Revolution. As a result a classification of types of uses is proposed. Relations between types of analogies and research ªelds are also established. In this paper we are less interested in discussing the “real nature” or “essence” or even the cognitive limitations of analogical thinking than in describing its various uses and different meanings as they changed over the course of a century.
机译:本文的目的是研究所谓的科学革命之后的一世纪中类比用法的范围和性质。使用JSTOR提供的研究工具,我们系统地分析了“类比”的用法及其认知(类比,类比等)在1665年至1780年间的伦敦皇家学会的《哲学交易》中。除了提供使用类比明确地定量评估论文比例的可能性外,这种方法还可以超越笛卡尔,开普勒,伽利略和其他所谓科学革命的研究巨人的特质案例。结果,提出了使用类型的分类。还建立了类比类型与研究领域之间的关系。在本文中,我们对讨论类比思维的“真实本质”或“本质”甚至是认知局限性的兴趣不如描述其在一个世纪中发生的变化的各种用途和不同的含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gingras Yves; Guay Alexandre;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号