首页> 外文OA文献 >Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【2h】

Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:社交焦虑的注意偏向调整:系统评价和荟萃分析

摘要

Research on attention bias modification (ABM) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) is inconclusive, with some studies finding clear positive effects and other studies finding no significant benefit relative to control training procedures. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of ABM for SAD on symptoms, reactivity to speech challenge, attentional bias (AB) toward threat, and secondary symptoms at posttraining as well as SAD symptoms at 4-month follow-up. A systematic search in bibliographical databases uncovered 15 randomized studies involving 1043 individuals that compared ABM to a control training procedure. Data were extracted independently by two raters. The Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity across trials. All analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat data. ABM produced a small but significant reduction in SAD symptoms (g = 0.27), reactivity to speech challenge (g = 0.46), and AB (g = 0.30). These effects were moderated by characteristics of the ABM procedure, the design of the study, and trait anxiety at baseline. However, effects on secondary symptoms (g = 0.09) and SAD symptoms at 4-month follow-up (g = 0.09) were not significant. Although there was no indication of significant publication bias, the quality of the studies was substandard and wedged the effect sizes. From a clinical point of view, these findings imply that ABM is not yet ready for wide-scale dissemination as a treatment for SAD in routine care. Theoretical implications for the integration of AB in the conceptualization of SAD are discussed.
机译:关于社交焦虑症(SAD)的注意力偏差修正(ABM)的研究尚无定论,有些研究发现明显的积极效果,而另一些研究则发现与对照训练程序相比没有明显的益处。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了ABM的SAD在症状,对言语挑战的反应性,针对威胁的注意偏见(AB)和训练后的继发症状以及在4个月随访中的SAD症状的疗效。在书目数据库中进行的系统搜索发现了15项随机研究,涉及1043名个体,他们将ABM与对照训练程序进行了比较。数据由两个评估者独立提取。 Q统计量用于评估各试验之间的同质性。所有分析均根据意向性数据进行。 ABM在SAD症状(g = 0.27),对言语挑战的反应性(g = 0.46)和AB(g = 0.30)方面产生了少量但显着的减轻。这些影响通过ABM程序的特征,研究的设计和基线的特质焦虑得到缓解。但是,对继发症状(g = 0.09)和SAD症状的4个月随访(g = 0.09)的影响并不显着。尽管没有明显的出版偏倚迹象,但研究质量不合格,影响规模不大。从临床角度来看,这些发现暗示ABM尚未准备好大规模传播作为常规护理中SAD的治疗方法。讨论了AB整合在SAD概念化中的理论意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号