首页> 外文OA文献 >Accuracy of Wrist-worn Physical Activity Monitors to Measure Energy Expenditure
【2h】

Accuracy of Wrist-worn Physical Activity Monitors to Measure Energy Expenditure

机译:腕式身体活动监测仪测量能量消耗的准确性

摘要

IIn recent years, the popularity and demand of physical activity monitors has drastically risen with the need and want to improve physical fitness. Newer devices worn on the wrist measure both heart rate and energy expenditure but the accuracy of these measurements is unclear. PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy of three separate wrist-worn activity monitors to estimate energy expenditure during structured periods of aerobic exercise. METHODS: Twelve men and three women (22 ± 3 years, 25 ± 3 kg/m2) consented to participate in this study. Three different physical activity monitors, TomTom Cardio (TT), Microsoft Band (MB), and Fitbit Surge (FB), were randomly assigned to either the left or right wrist of each participant. The instructions for the testing procedure were thoroughly explained to every participant at the start of each trial. The treadmill started at a speed of 2 mph and increased by 1 mph every three minutes up to a max speed of 6 mph. Energy expenditure was estimated through direct measurement of oxygen consumed and carbon dioxide produced through a metabolic cart (MC, Parvo Medics True One ®2400). The mean bias in energy expenditure between MC and each device was calculated. Pearson product-moment correlations and 95% equivalence testing were also calculated. Statistical significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean bias between the MC and devices at 2 mph varied from -1.9 ± 1.1 kcal/min (FB) to 0.7 ± 1.0 kcal/min (MB) while the mean bias at 6 mph varied from -1.7 ± 2.1 kcal/min (MB) to 5.2 ± 1.7 kcal/min (TT). For total energy expenditure, all devices were significantly correlated with the MC (FB: r=0.66, p=0.007; TomTom: r=0.77, pu3c0.001; MB: r=0.59, p=0.02). The mean bias for total energy expenditure was -25 ± 16 kcal for the FB, 26 ± 13 kcal for the TT, and -11 ± 17 kcal for the MB. The equivalence zone for MC was 88 kcal to 108 kcal but 90% confidence intervals of devices did not fall within this zone. CONCLUSION: The wrist-worn physical activity monitors used in this study that measure heart rate and energy expenditure tend to either underestimate or overestimate total energy expenditure from treadmill walking and running.
机译:近年来,体育锻炼监测器的普及和需求随着人们的需求而大大增加,并希望提高身体健康度。戴在手腕上的新型设备可同时测量心率和能量消耗,但这些测量的准确性尚不清楚。目的:测量三个单独的腕上活动监测仪的准确性,以估计有氧运动的结构化期间的能量消耗。方法:十二名男性和三名女性(22±3岁,25±3 kg / m2)同意参加这项研究。将三个不同的体育锻炼监控器,TomTom Cardio(TT),Microsoft Band(MB)和Fitbit Surge(FB)随机分配给每个参与者的左手或右手腕。在每次试验开始时,都会向每个参与者彻底解释测试程序的说明。跑步机以2 mph的速度启动,每三分钟以1 mph的速度增加,最大速度达到6 mph。通过直接测量通过代谢推车(MC,Parvo Medics True One®2400)消耗的氧气和产生的二氧化碳来估算能量消耗。计算了MC和每个设备之间的能量消耗的平均偏差。还计算了Pearson乘积矩相关性和95%等效性测试。统计显着性设置为0.05的alpha水平。结果:在2 mph时MC和设备之间的平均偏差从-1.9±1.1 kcal / min(FB)到0.7±1.0 kcal / min(MB),而在6 mph时的平均偏差从-1.7±2.1 kcal / min变化min(MB)至5.2±1.7 kcal / min(TT)。对于总能量消耗,所有设备均与MC显着相关(FB:r = 0.66,p = 0.007; TomTom:r = 0.77,p u3c0.001; MB:r = 0.59,p = 0.02)。 FB的总能量消耗的平均偏差为-25±16 kcal,TT为26±13 kcal,MB为-11±17 kcal。 MC的等效区域为88 kcal至108 kcal,但设备的90%置信区间不在此区域内。结论:本研究中使用的腕上运动监测仪测量心率和能量消耗,往往低估或高估了跑步机行走和跑步的总能量消耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号