首页> 外文OA文献 >Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia-Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?
【2h】

Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia-Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?

机译:国际科学合作的原因和发展:从文献计量学的角度来看,亚太研究领域是否存在?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes the different forms of and tries to give reasons for international scientific collaboration in general. It focuses on eleven countries in the Asia-Pacific region by evaluating their national research output with the help of bibliometric indicators in particular. Over two million journal articles published by these countries between 1998 and 2007 in ISI-listed periodicals are analyzed. Discipline-specific publication and citation profiles reveal national strengths and weaknesses in the different research domains. The exponential increase in publication output by China over the last few years is astonishing, but in terms of visibility, i.e. citation rates, China cannot keep up with leading science nations, remaining below the world average. A discipline-specific analysis shows that Chinese authors took an active part in more than a quarter of all articles and reviews published in the field of materials science in 2007, while their contribution to medical research is very low. Co-publication networks among the eleven countries are generated to observe the development of cooperation bonds in the region. Applying Salton's measure of international collaboration strength, an above-average strengthening of scientific collaboration in the Asia-Pacific region can be observed.
机译:本文描述了国际科学合作的不同形式,并试图给出总体原因。通过特别借助文献计量指标评估本国的研究成果,它着重于亚太地区的11个国家。这些国家在1998年至2007年之间在ISI列出的期刊上发表了超过200万本期刊文章。特定学科的出版物和引文简介揭示了不同研究领域的国家优势和劣势。在过去的几年中,中国的出版物产量呈指数级增长,这是惊人的,但就可见度(即引文率)而言,中国无法赶上领先的科学国家,仍低于世界平均水平。一项针对特定学科的分析表明,在2007年材料科学领域发表的所有文章和评论中,中国作者活跃于四分之一以上,而他们对医学研究的贡献却很低。建立了十一个国家之间的联合出版物网络,以观察该地区合作关系的发展。运用Salton的国际合作实力衡量方法,可以观察到亚太地区科学合作的强度高于平均水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号