首页> 外文OA文献 >Analisis biaya manfaat atas penggunaan teknologi petik gunting pada tanaman teh (camellia sinensis (l) o kuntze): Studi kasus pada perkebunan teh pt. chakra holding company bandung
【2h】

Analisis biaya manfaat atas penggunaan teknologi petik gunting pada tanaman teh (camellia sinensis (l) o kuntze): Studi kasus pada perkebunan teh pt. chakra holding company bandung

机译:在茶树中使用剪刀采摘技术的效益成本分析:以茶园为例。万隆脉轮控股公司

摘要

Since the beginning of 2000, the company has been applying Shear Plucking Method although it still use a Manual Plucking Method. The purpose of this research is to analyze the financial benefit of using Shear Plucking Method.udThe approach of the research is to compare the cash flow from Shear Plucking and Manual Plucking in one plucking cycle (4 years). Shear Plucking Method need additional treatment for land handling, additional tool for the modified scissor and additional fertilizer for the land. These treatments need additional cost. In the other side, Shear Plucking Method produce tea more than Manual Plucking Method.udResult of the research, show that Shear Plucking Method give more benefit than Manual Plucking Method. Shear Plucking Method produce about 5.000 to 6.000 tons tea per hectare per year. Manual Plucking only produce tea about 2.500 to 3.000 tons per hectare per year. It means Shear Plucking Method produce about 2.000 to 3.000 tons more tea, than Manual Plucking per hectare per year.udThe cost of Shear Plucking Method is higher than Manual Plucking Method, but if we compared with amount of product that produces by Shear Plucking Method, Cost Of Goods Sold (COGS) in this method is still lower than Cost Of Goods (COGS) in Manual Plucking method.udThe average price of goods sale for Manual Plucking method is more beneficial than Shear Plucking Method, because it's influence by the quality or grade of tea that can be produced by each method. Manual Plucking Method quality or grade of tea is better than Shear Plucking Method.udIn the future, Shear Plucking Method can be applied to other areas that havent used this method
机译:自2000年初以来,该公司一直在使用“剪切采摘法”,尽管它仍然使用“手动采摘法”。本研究的目的是分析使用剪切采摘方法的财务收益。 ud研究方法是比较一个采摘周期(4年)中来自剪切采摘和手工采摘的现金流量。采毛方法需要对土地进行额外处理,为剪刀剪增加工具,为土地增加肥料。这些治疗需要额外的费用。另一方面,剪切采摘法比手工采摘法生产的茶更多。 ud研究结果表明,剪切采摘法比手工采摘法更有益。采毛法每公顷每年可生产约5.000至6.000吨茶。人工采摘每公顷每年只能生产约2.500至3.000吨的茶。这意味着采摘法每年每公顷的采茶量比人工采摘法多出约2000吨至3.000吨。 ,这种方法的商品销售成本(COGS)仍低于人工采摘方法的商品成本(COGS)。 ud人工采摘方法的平均销售商品价格比剪切采摘方法更有利,因为它受到定价的影响。每种方法可生产的茶的质量或等级。手动采茶方法的质量或等级要比剪切采茶方法好。 ud将来,剪切采茶方法可以应用于其他尚未使用该方法的地区

著录项

  • 作者

    Rinaldy Rico;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号