首页> 外文OA文献 >Patterns of Differential Involvement in Terrorist Activities: Evidence from DHKP/C and Turkish Hezbollah
【2h】

Patterns of Differential Involvement in Terrorist Activities: Evidence from DHKP/C and Turkish Hezbollah

机译:恐怖活动中不同程度的参与方式:来自DHKP / C和土耳其真主党的证据

摘要

This study examines the patterns of involvement in terrorist activities for the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C) and Turkish Hezbollah members. The study is based on the assumption that terrorists differ in terms of their involvement in terrorist activities. In this sense, there are full-time and part-time terrorists. Full-time terrorists act professionally and do the assignments given by their commanders. Part-time terrorists, on the other hand, act on a non-professional basis and have their own motivations to participate in terrorist activities. For part-timers, there are various factors that may have an effect on their degree of involvement in terrorist activities. Their decisions regarding whether to participate in a specific terrorist act can be influenced by individual factors as well as the instructions and assignments given to them. In this study, these factors are categorized under four different headings; demographic, relative deprivation, frustration, and social learning. Data regarding the involvement in terrorist activities (as measured by arrest records) and demographics (age, gender, marital status, social class), relative deprivation (education, work status), frustration (school dropout, loss of a loved one in a counter-terrorism operation, family arrest), and social learning (family association to a terrorist group and recruitment method) was collected from terrorists’ autobiographies. Research hypotheses were tested using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. The findings indicated that relative deprivation, frustration, and social learning models can explain the differences in the degree of involvement in terrorism for DHKP/C members, but not for Turkish Hezbollah members (controlling for demographic variables). The results showed that these three models may account for some of the differences in involvement in terrorist activities.
机译:这项研究研究了革命人民解放党/阵线(DHKP / C)和土耳其真主党成员参与恐怖活动的方式。该研究基于这样一个假设,即恐怖分子参与恐怖活动的方式不同。从这个意义上讲,有专职和兼职的恐怖分子。专职恐怖分子采取专业行动,执行指挥官的任务。另一方面,兼职恐怖分子是在非专业的基础上行动的,他们有参加恐怖主义活动的动机。对于兼职人员而言,有多种因素可能影响其参与恐怖活动的程度。他们关于是否参与特定恐怖行为的决定可能会受到个人因素以及给予他们的指示和任务的影响。在这项研究中,这些因素归为四个不同的标题。人口,相对匮乏,沮丧和社会学习。有关参与恐怖活动(以逮捕记录衡量)和人口统计资料(年龄,性别,婚姻状况,社会阶层),相对贫困(教育,工作状况),沮丧(失学,失恋的人)的数据-恐怖主义行动,家庭逮捕)和社会学习(与恐怖团体的家庭联系和招募方法)是从恐怖分子的自传中收集的。研究假设使用双变量和多变量统计分析进行检验。调查结果表明,相对剥夺,挫折和社会学习模式可以解释DHKP / C成员参与恐怖主义的程度差异,但不能解释土耳其真主党成员(控制人口变量)参与恐怖主义的程度。结果表明,这三种模型可能解释了参与恐怖活动的某些差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yilmaz Ismail;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号