首页> 外文OA文献 >A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
【2h】

A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

机译:一种用于深经颅磁刺激(TMS)的真正的电磁安慰剂(REMP)设备。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: There is growing interest in neuropsychiatry for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a neuromodulatorytreatment. However, there are limitations in interpreting rTMS effects as a real consequence of physiological brain changes or as placebo-mediated unspecific effects, which may be particularly strong in psychiatric patients. This is due to the fact that existing sham rTMSprocedures are less than optimal. A new placebo tool is introduced here, called real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device, which cansimulate the scalp sensation induced by the real TMS, while leaving both the visual impact and acoustic sensation of real TMS unaltered.Methods: Physical, neurophysiological and behavioural variables of monophasic and biphasic single-pulse TMS and biphasic 1 Hz and20 Hz rTMS procedures (at different intensities) were tested in subjects who were expert or naı¨ve of TMS. Results of the real TMS werecompared with those induced by the REMP device and with two other currently used sham procedures, namely the commercially availableMagstim sham coil and tilting the real coil by 90.Results: The REMP device, besides producing scalp sensations similar to the real TMS, attenuated the TMS-induced electric field (asmeasured by a dipole probe) to a biologically inactive level. Behaviourally, neither expert nor naı¨ve TMS subjects identified the ‘‘coilat 90’’ or the ‘‘Magstim sham coil’’ as a real TMS intervention, whilst naı¨ve subjects were significantly more likely to identify theREMP-attenuated TMS as real.Conclusions: The ‘‘goodness of sham’’ of the REMP device is demonstrated by physical, neurophysiological, and behavioural results.Significance: Such placebo TMS is superior to the available sham procedures when applied on subjects naı¨ve to TMS, as in case ofpatients undergoing a clinical rTMS trial.
机译:目的:对于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为神经调节治疗的神经精神病学越来越感兴趣。但是,将rTMS效应解释为生理性脑部改变的真实结果或安慰剂介导的非特异性效应存在局限性,这在精神病患者中尤其明显。这是由于现有的伪RTMS程序不够理想。这里介绍了一种新的安慰剂工具,称为真实电磁安慰剂(REMP)设备,它可以模拟真实TMS引起的头皮感觉,同时不改变真实TMS的视觉冲击和听觉感觉。方法:物理,神经生理学和单相和双相单脉冲TMS的行为变量以及双相1 Hz和20 Hz rTMS程序(在不同强度下)在TMS专家或天真的受试者中进行了测试。真实TMS的结果与REMP设备和其他两种目前使用的假手术程序所产生的结果进行比较,即市售的Magstim假线圈和将真实线圈倾斜90°。结果:REMP设备除了产生类似于真实的头皮感觉TMS将TMS感应的电场(由偶极子探针测得)衰减至生物惰性水平。行为上,无论是专家还是单纯的TMS受试者都没有将“ coilat 90”或“ Magstim sham coil”识别为真正的TMS干预措施,而幼稚的受试者则更有可能将REMP减毒的TMS识别为真实的TMS干预措施。结论:REMP设备的“假善”可通过物理,神经生理学和行为结果得到证明。意义:这种安慰剂TMS在应用于初次接受TMS的受试者时,优于可用的假手术,例如接受rTMS临床试验的患者

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号