首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Policy and Inequality in Australia and New Zealand: Proceedings of Joint Conference with the New Zealand Planning Council, Wellington, New Zealand 10-11 November 1988
【2h】

Social Policy and Inequality in Australia and New Zealand: Proceedings of Joint Conference with the New Zealand Planning Council, Wellington, New Zealand 10-11 November 1988

机译:澳大利亚和新西兰的社会政策与不平等:与新西兰计划委员会联合会议的会议录,1988年11月10日至11日,新西兰惠灵顿

摘要

The economic and social structures of Australia and New Zealand have always shared many common features. Both have been strong trading nations, relying on agriculture and other primary produce, as well as raw materials and minerals as a source of export earnings. Both have retained strong economic and political ties to the United Kingdom. Both have indigenous people struggling to maintain their political and cultural identity in societies where the mainstream has followed trends in Britain and, to a lesser extent, North America. Finally, both have a similar demographic structure, but one that is strikingly different from most European countries, being characterised by a population comprising more younger people and far fewer elderly people than their European counterparts.Events in Australia and New Zealand in the eighties have further strengthened the perception of similarity in the experience of both countries. With Labor Governments elected to office in the first half of the decade, both faced a similar immediate economic problem of how to confront a loss of traditional export markets in an international economy far more open to competitive forces than in earlier decades. Trade protection of the agricultural and other key sectors - the traditional response in both countries - appeared no longer to be a feasible option either economically or politically. In the event, the new governments adopted broadly similar economic strategies characterised by deregulation, fiscal restraint and public sector reform. These policies have not been pursued at no cost to social policy, and in both countries there has been considerable disquiet at the possibility that social justice has been the victim of policies driven by the dictates of economic rationalism. The papers in this Report represent the beginning of an attempt to assess the extent to which this has been the case. A fuller account will need to wait several more years, although it will hopefully be prepared in due course.
机译:澳大利亚和新西兰的经济和社会结构始终具有许多共同特征。两国都是强大的贸易国,依靠农业和其他初级产品以及原材料和矿产作为出口收入的来源。两者都与英国保持着牢固的经济和政治联系。两者都在土著人民努力维持其政治和文化特征的社会中,主流社会遵循了英国的趋势,而北美跟随其次。最后,两者的人口结构相似,但与大多数欧洲国家却截然不同,其特点是人口比欧洲年轻人更多,而老年人则少得多.80年代在澳大利亚和新西兰发生的事件进一步加强了两国经验中相似性的认识。工党政府在本十年的前五十年当选,这两个国家都面临着类似的眼前经济问题,即如何面对国际经济中传统出口市场的流失,这比起前几十年对竞争力量更开放。农业和其他关键部门的贸易保护-两国的传统对策-在经济或政治上似乎不再是可行的选择。结果,新政府采取了广泛相似的经济战略,其特点是放松管制,财政约束和公共部门改革。这些政策并未不花任何代价就奉行社会政策,在这两个国家中,社会正义一直是经济理性主义的决定所驱动的政策的受害者的可能性已相当令人不安。本报告中的文件代表了评估这种情况的尝试的开始。一个完整的帐户将需要再等待几年,尽管它有望在适当的时候准备好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号