首页> 外文OA文献 >Are family managers in Chinese family businesses agents or stewards? the impacts of corporate governance on the performance of Chinese family businesses, and the moderating effects of leadership styles
【2h】

Are family managers in Chinese family businesses agents or stewards? the impacts of corporate governance on the performance of Chinese family businesses, and the moderating effects of leadership styles

机译:中国家族企业的家族管理者是代理人还是管家?公司治理对中国家族企业绩效的影响以及领导风格的适度影响

摘要

Drawing on agency theory, stewardship theory, and transformational leadership theory, this thesis investigated three research questions: Do CFBs implement control-oriented governance mechanisms towards their family managers? If they do, how do these control-oriented governance mechanisms influence CFBs’ financial performance? Would CFB owners’ leadership style influence the effect of control-oriented governance mechanisms on CFBs’ financial performance? The study of 186 family businesses operating in seven major cities of China's eastern-coastal and inland regions has identified three key findings. First, the sampled CFBs govern their family managers with control-oriented governance mechanisms that are widely practised in western business contexts. Second, these governance mechanisms significantly improve CFBs’ financial performance. Third, the identified governance-performance relationship is negatively moderated by the leadership style of CFB owners. These findings suggest that family managers in CFBs behave more as agents than stewards. That is, they tend to be self-serving and work for their own interests at the expense of their CFB owners and their family businesses. However, transformational owners in CFBs can reduce the agent-like behaviour of family managers, with the contribution of control-oriented governance mechanisms to firm performance decreasing under transformational leadership. The negative moderating effect also seems to suggest that transformational leadership and control-oriented corporate governance have substitute effects on firm performance.The contributions of the thesis can be summarized as follows. Academically, the findings have enhanced our understanding of governance practices and leadership styles currently practised in family businesses in China; reinforced the relevance of dominant theoretical perspectives – agency and stewardship – to the understanding of family managers in a strong Confucian culture; and addressed the contradictory predictions of two competing theories by bringing a moderator (leadership style) into the model. Practically, the findings have shown that establishing control-oriented governance mechanisms in CFBs may work as a temporary measure to address agency problems, with transformational leadership presenting potentially greater value in CFBs. All in all, given the family business sector's rising significance in China and the paucity of empirical research on the sector, this thesis not only addresses the empirical void but also enriches our understanding of corporate governance practices in context.
机译:本文基于代理理论,管理理论和变革型领导理论,研究了三个研究问题:CFB是否对家族管理者实施了控制导向的治理机制?如果这样做的话,这些以控制为导向的治理机制将如何影响CFB的财务绩效? CFB所有者的领导风格会影响以控制为导向的治理机制对CFB财务绩效的影响吗?对在中国东部沿海和内陆地区的七个主要城市经营的186家家族企业的研究确定了三个关键发现。首先,抽样的CFB通过在西方商业环境中广泛采用的面向控制的治理机制来治理其家族管理者。其次,这些治理机制大大改善了CFB的财务绩效。第三,确定的治理绩效关系受到CFB所有者的领导风格的不利影响。这些发现表明,CFB的家族管理者的行为要比管家多。也就是说,他们倾向于自我服务并为自己的利益而工作,而牺牲了他们的CFB所有者和家族企业。但是,CFB的转型所有者可以减少家族管理者的代理人行为,而在转型领导下,以控制为导向的治理机制对公司绩效的贡献会下降。负调节作用似乎也暗示了变革型领导和控制导向的公司治理对公司绩效具有替代作用。本文的贡献可归纳如下。从学术上讲,这些发现增强了我们对中国家族企业目前实行的治理实践和领导风格的理解;加强了主导理论观点(代理和管理)与了解浓厚儒家文化的家族管理者的关系;并通过将主持人(领导风格)引入模型来解决两种相互竞争的理论的矛盾预测。实际上,研究结果表明,在CFB中建立面向控制的治理机制可能是解决代理机构问题的临时措施,而变革型领导力可能会在CFB中发挥更大的作用。总而言之,鉴于家族企业在中国的重要性日益提高以及对该领域实证研究的匮乏,本论文不仅解决了实证空白,而且丰富了我们对背景下公司治理实践的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号