首页> 外文OA文献 >Australian Defence Industry Productivity
【2h】

Australian Defence Industry Productivity

机译:澳大利亚国防工业生产力

摘要

Since 2001 the Australian Government has applied increasing pressure to the Department of Defence to find efficiency savings in its ongoing business operation. During the early 2000s the savings required by the Australian Government in the operational costs of the Department of Defence were fixed amounts and realised primarily through the reduction of administrative overheads and the early retirement of specific military platforms1 such as two of the guided missile frigates (Defence 2008).In 2005 the Australian Government introduced to specific parts of the Department of Defence budget the concept of an efficiency dividend, which required an ongoing percentage of budgetary funds to be returned to the Australian Government in the form of savings. Between 2005 and 2011, as the size and scope of the efficiency dividend increased, the Department of Defence has been required to develop initiatives internally and externally to meet its savings commitments to the Government. One of the initiatives under investigation is ensuring that the productivity benefits generated by the Australian defence industry are distributed equitably to the Department of Defence in its role as sole consumer of defence industry goods and services. Using an index number approach, this study empirically measures the changes in the productivity of the Australian defence industry during the period 2001 to 2009. In addition, the study compares changes in defence industry productivity with changes in defence industry profits, defence industry employee wages, the quality of service being provided by the defence industry, and the level of competition in the defence industry marketplace, to determine how any productivity benefits are being distributed. This study finds that during the period of interest, the defence industry experienced an increase in both multifactor and labour productivity. The study finds evidence to suggest that changes in defence industry productivity have an effect on both the profitability and performance measures calculated for the defence industry but have no obvious direct relationship with changes in defence industry employee wages. The study also finds evidence to suggest that even small changes in the level of competition within the defence industry market can potentially influence changes in defence industry productivity.
机译:自2001年以来,澳大利亚政府对国防部施加越来越大的压力,要求其在正在进行的业务运营中节省效率。在2000年代初,澳大利亚政府在国防部的运营成本中所节省的费用是固定数额,主要是通过减少行政管理费用和特定军事平台的提前退休来实现的,例如,两艘导弹导弹护卫舰(Defence)。 2008年)。2005年,澳大利亚政府向国防部预算的特定部分引入了效率红利的概念,这要求持续不断地将一定比例的预算资金以储蓄的形式返还给澳大利亚政府。在2005年至2011年之间,随着效率红利的规模和范围的扩大,国防部被要求在内部和外部制定计划,以履行对政府的节约承诺。正在调查的一项举措是确保将澳大利亚国防工业产生的生产力收益平均分配给国防部,该部门是国防工业产品和服务的唯一消费者。本研究使用指数法对来自2001年至2009年期间澳大利亚国防工业生产率的变化进行了实证评估。此外,该研究还比较了国防工业生产率的变化与国防工业利润,国防工业员工工资,国防工业提供的服务质量以及国防工业市场中的竞争水平,以确定如何分配生产率收益。这项研究发现,在感兴趣的时期,国防工业经历了多因素和劳动生产率的增长。该研究发现证据表明,国防工业生产率的变化对国防工业计算的利润率和绩效指标都有影响,但与国防工业雇员工资的变化没有明显的直接关系。该研究还发现证据表明,即使国防工业市场中竞争水平的微小变化也有可能影响国防工业生产率的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号