首页> 外文OA文献 >Where has all the Engineering gone? And how we might put it back: an Investigation into the Integration of a Systems Engineering Framework for the Development of System Dynamics Models
【2h】

Where has all the Engineering gone? And how we might put it back: an Investigation into the Integration of a Systems Engineering Framework for the Development of System Dynamics Models

机译:所有工程都去了哪里?以及如何退回去:对用于开发系统动力学模型的系统工程框架进行集成的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

System dynamics allows us to discover and explore the dynamics behind the complex problems commonly seen in management scenarios that defy our best efforts to resolve them. Yet despite all it has to offer, system dynamics modelling has been less than universally accepted as a management tool. System dynamics has its origins in control theory where robust design and calculation are fundamentals, and in posing the question, “Where has all the engineering gone?” this thesis traces the evolution of system dynamics away from its engineering roots. It explores the increasing trend in system dynamics interventions to portray the conceptual causal structure of complex problems through qualitative mapping and then to rely on the conceptualisation and largely untested assumptions as the basis for creating computational models. This deviation, in conjunction with object oriented software packages, has increased the accessibility of system dynamics widely. The risk however is that that the consequent quantitative analysis can lead to erroneous and misleading conclusions, discrediting the approach.To build rigorous, insightful system dynamics models demands diligent application of a robust methodology. In addressing this need, this thesis seeks to answer the question “Can systems engineering put the engineering back?” The utility of applying systems engineering principles to put the engineering back into system dynamics to support credible and transparent design outcomes is investigated. Through the detailed comparison and analysis of design philosophies, the theoretical basis for the application of systems engineering to system dynamics is established. The principles of method, which form the basis of an integrated, design focused approach to system dynamics modelling are developed and then presented through application to a case tutorial. The resultant modelling project show that the clarity, documentation, and traceability of models back to the modelling requirements were increased. Difficulties in maintaining momentum in developing system dynamics analysis and stop-start engagement with the client group all threaten the quality of a system dynamics modelling intervention and the likelihood of successful implementation of the strategy.
机译:系统动力学使我们能够发现和探索管理场景中常见的复杂问题背后的动力学,这些复杂问题无视我们为解决这些问题所做的最大努力。尽管提供了所有功能,但是系统动力学建模并没有被普遍接受为一种管理工具。系统动力学起源于以稳健的设计和计算为基础的控制理论,并提出了一个问题:“所有工程都去了哪里?”,本论文追溯了系统动力学从其工程根源的演变。它探索了系统动力学干预的增长趋势,以通过定性映射描绘复杂问题的概念因果结构,然后以概念化和很大程度上未经检验的假设为基础来创建计算模型。这种偏差与面向对象的软件包一起,大大提高了系统动力学的可访问性。然而,风险在于随之而来的定量分析可能会导致错误和误导性的结论,从而使该方法失去信誉。要建立严格,有见地的系统动力学模型,则需要勤奋地应用可靠的方法。为了满足这一需求,本论文试图回答“系统工程可以将工程退回吗?”的问题,研究了应用系统工程原理将工程重新纳入系统动力学以支持可靠和透明的设计成果的实用性。通过对设计理念的详细比较和分析,为系统工程在系统动力学中的应用奠定了理论基础。开发了方法原理,这些原理构成了集成的,以设计为中心的系统动力学建模方法的基础,然后通过在案例教程中进行介绍。所得的建模项目表明,增加了对建模要求的模型的清晰度,文档编制和可追溯性。在开发系统动力学分析中保持动力的困难以及与客户组的启停接触都威胁着系统动力学建模干预的质量以及该策略成功实施的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号