首页> 外文OA文献 >Grounded theory and ethnography combined: a methodology to study children’s interactions on children’s mobile libraries
【2h】

Grounded theory and ethnography combined: a methodology to study children’s interactions on children’s mobile libraries

机译:扎实的理论和人种志相结合:一种在儿童移动图书馆上研究儿童互动的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE. Libraries are closing or reducing opening hours in the UK due to budgetary cuts. Library provision for children is consequently diminishing and libraries have to justify their existence. Therefore a reliable methodology for assessing the importance of libraries is vital to demonstrate their value to children’s literacy. Two methodologies were combined to study children visiting children’s mobile libraries (CMLs). The purpose of this paper is to consider whether the combined, qualitative methodology was the correct choice. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH. Aspects of each methodology are examined for their appropriateness for researching children. The compatibility of their philosophical stance and the validity of combining ethnography and grounded theory is explored and questioned. FINDINGS. It is found that grounded theory and ethnography were the optimum combination to form a powerful research tool that allows children to be active participants in research. The combined methodology was successful because the ethnographic elements allowed the researcher to enter to the children’s world, whereas the grounded theory elements provided a structural framework, exploration into a novel research topic and ensured that a valid conclusion was drawn. ORIGINALITY/VALUE. It is unusual for qualitative methodologies such as grounded theory and ethnography to be combined in order to study learning in a non-pedagogic, library environment. This paper is valuable reading for librarians, or educationalists wishing to examine how libraries aid literacy because it verifies the benefits of the combined methodology of grounded theory and ethnography and provides a template which can be used by other researchers.
机译:目的。由于预算削减,英国的图书馆正在关闭或减少开放时间。因此,为儿童而设的图书馆数量正在减少,图书馆必须证明其存在的合理性。因此,一种可靠的评估图书馆重要性的方法对于证明其对儿童扫盲的价值至关重要。结合了两种方法来研究访问儿童移动图书馆(CML)的孩子。本文的目的是考虑组合的定性方法是否是正确的选择。设计/方法/方法。对每种方法的各个方面进行了研究,以检查它们是否适合研究儿童。他们的哲学立场的相容性以及人种学和扎根的理论相结合的有效性受到了探讨和质疑。发现。发现扎根理论和人种志是形成强大的研究工具的最佳组合,使孩子们可以积极地参与研究。组合方法论是成功的,因为人种学因素使研究人员能够进入儿童世界,而扎根的理论因素则提供了结构框架,探索了一个新颖的研究主题,并确保得出了正确的结论。原创性/价值。定性方法(例如扎根的理论和人种志方法)相结合以在非教育性图书馆环境中学习学习是不寻常的。对于希望研究图书馆如何帮助识字的图书馆员或教育家来说,本文是有价值的阅读,因为它验证了扎实的理论和民族志相结合的方法论的好处,并提供了可供其他研究人员使用的模板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号