首页> 外文OA文献 >TCT-182 Randomized Comparison Of Provisional Side Branch Stenting Versus A Two-Stent Strategy For Treatment Of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Involving A Large Side Branch. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV – OCT Substudy

【2h】

TCT-182 Randomized Comparison Of Provisional Side Branch Stenting Versus A Two-Stent Strategy For Treatment Of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Involving A Large Side Branch. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV – OCT Substudy

机译：TCT-182临时侧支支架的随机比较和两支架策略治疗涉及大侧支的真正冠状动脉分叉病变。北欧-波罗的海分叉研究IV – OCT子研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Ørhøj Trine; Holm Niels R.; Nielsen Troels M.; Tu Shengxian; Maeng Michael; Dijkstra Jouke; Hjort Jakob; Lassen Jens F.; Christiansen Evald H.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2014
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI) [J] . Chen Shao-Liang, Ye Fei, Zhang Jun-Jie, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions . 2015,第4期

机译：FFR引导和血管造影引导的临时冠状动脉分叉病变临时支架的随机比较DKCRUSH-VI试验（双吻挤压与临时支架技术治疗VI冠状动脉分叉病变）
2. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. [J] . Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2009,第1期

机译：真正冠状动脉分岔粉碎技术随机研究真正的冠状动脉分支：仙人掌（冠状动脉分叉：用Sirolimus洗脱支架的应用）研究。
3. Randomized comparison of conservative versus aggressive strategy for provisional side branch intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions: Results from the SMART-STRATEGY (SMart Angioplasty Research Team-Optimal STRATEGY for Side Branch Intervention in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) Randomized trial [J] . JACC. Cardiovascular interventions . 2012,第11期

机译：冠状动脉分叉病变中临时侧支干预的保守与积极策略的随机比较：SMART-STRATEGY（Smart血管成形术研究小组-冠状动脉分叉病变侧支介入的最佳策略）的随机试验
4. Original research: Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV [O] . Indulis Kumsars, Niels Ramsing Holm, Matti Niemelä, 2020

机译：原始研究：临时侧支支架置入术与两支架策略治疗涉及大侧支的真正冠状动脉分叉病变的随机比较：北欧波罗的海分叉研究IV
5. Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI) [O] . Chen Shao-Liang, Ye Fei, Zhang Jun-Jie, 2015

机译：FFR引导和血管造影引导的真正冠状动脉分叉病变临时支架的随机比较DKCRUSH-VI试验（双吻挤压与临时支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变VI）

TCT-182 Randomized Comparison Of Provisional Side Branch Stenting Versus A Two-Stent Strategy For Treatment Of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Involving A Large Side Branch. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV – OCT Substudy

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅