首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of Respondent Acceptability of Preference Measures: Discriminatory Power of Graphic Positioning Scale versus Traditional Scaling Measures

【2h】

Assessment of Respondent Acceptability of Preference Measures: Discriminatory Power of Graphic Positioning Scale versus Traditional Scaling Measures

机译：偏好措施的受访者可接受性评估：图形定位量表与传统比例量表的歧视力

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Franic Duska M.; Pathak Dev S.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2003
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering [J] . FranicD.M., BotheA.K., BramlettR.E. Journal of communication disorders . 2012,第5期

机译：评估口吃偏好措施中受访者的可接受性
2. s): All participants completed the SF-36 as a measure of HR-QOL and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the FAAM Sport version (FAAMS) as assessments of functional limitation. To compare the FAI and Ul groups, we calculated multiple analyses of variance followed by univariate tests. Additionally, we correlated the SF-36 summary component scale and domain scales with the FAAM and FAAMS scores. Results: Participants with FAI had lower scores on the SF-36 physical component summary (FA... [J] . Brent L. Arnold, Cynthia J. Wright, IVSEd, Journal of athletic training . 2011,第6期

机译：s）：所有参与者均完成了SF-36的测量，作为HR-QOL的量度，以及足踝能力测量（FAAM）和FAAM Sport版本（FAAMS），以评估功能受限。为了比较FAI和Ul组，我们计算了方差的多次分析，然后进行了单变量检验。此外，我们将SF-36摘要成分量表和领域量表与FAAM和FAAMS分数相关联。结果：FAI参与者在SF-36身体成分摘要（FA ...
3. A Comparison of Pain Assessment Measures in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Rating Scale [J] . Myrvik Matthew P., Drendel Amy L., Brandow Amanda M., Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology: Official journal of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology . 2015,第3期

机译：小儿镰状细胞病疼痛评估方法的比较：视觉模拟量表与数字量表
4. THE PREFERENCES SCALE: MULTINATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF A NEW MEASURE OF MORNINGNESS [C] . Carlla S. Smith, Simon Folkard, Robert A. Schmieder, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting . 1993

机译：优先等级：对早晨新测量的多边评估
5. Affect and cognition measures in preference-based decisions: Validity testing of the Ottawa Decisional Conflict Scale and a decision-specific anxiety measure with men eligible for prostate cancer screening [D] . Linder, Suzanne Kneuper. 2010

机译：基于偏好的决策中的情感和认知措施：渥太华决策冲突量表的有效性测试以及针对符合前列腺癌筛查条件的男性的决策特定焦虑措施
6. Measuring Pain. Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Pain Scale: What is the Difference? [O] . Claire Johnson 2005

机译：测量疼痛。视觉模拟量表与数字疼痛量表：有什么区别？
7. PMI26: ASSESSMENT OF RESPONDENT ACCEPTABILITY OF UTILITY MEASURES: DISCRIMINATORY POWER OF GRAPHIC POSITIONING SCALE VERSUS TRADITIONAL SCALING MEASURES [O] . Franic DM, Pathak DS 2001

机译：PMI26：通用措施响应合格性的评估：图形定位比例尺与传统缩放比例尺的判别力

Assessment of Respondent Acceptability of Preference Measures: Discriminatory Power of Graphic Positioning Scale versus Traditional Scaling Measures

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅