首页> 外文OA文献 >Dimensionality and Summary Measures of the SF-36 v1.6: Comparison of Scale- and Item-Based Approach Across ECRHS II Adults Population

【2h】

Dimensionality and Summary Measures of the SF-36 v1.6: Comparison of Scale- and Item-Based Approach Across ECRHS II Adults Population

机译：SF-36 v1.6的维度和摘要措施：跨ECRHS II成人人群的基于量表和基于项目的方法比较

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Grassi Mario; Nucera Andrea;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2010
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Dimensionality and summary measures of the SF-36 v1.6: comparison of scale- and item-based approach across ECRHS II adults population. [J] . Grassi M, Nucera A Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research . 2010,第4期

机译：SF-36 v1.6的维度和摘要度量：ECRHS II成人人群中基于量表和基于项目的方法的比较。
2. s): All participants completed the SF-36 as a measure of HR-QOL and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the FAAM Sport version (FAAMS) as assessments of functional limitation. To compare the FAI and Ul groups, we calculated multiple analyses of variance followed by univariate tests. Additionally, we correlated the SF-36 summary component scale and domain scales with the FAAM and FAAMS scores. Results: Participants with FAI had lower scores on the SF-36 physical component summary (FA... [J] . Brent L. Arnold, Cynthia J. Wright, IVSEd, Journal of athletic training . 2011,第6期

机译：s）：所有参与者均完成了SF-36的测量，作为HR-QOL的量度，以及足踝能力测量（FAAM）和FAAM Sport版本（FAAMS），以评估功能受限。为了比较FAI和Ul组，我们计算了方差的多次分析，然后进行了单变量检验。此外，我们将SF-36摘要成分量表和领域量表与FAAM和FAAMS分数相关联。结果：FAI参与者在SF-36身体成分摘要（FA ...
3. Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. II. A comparison of the SF-36 with disease-specific measures. [J] . Kvien TK, Kaasa S, Smedstad LM Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 1998,第11期

机译：挪威SF-36健康调查在类风湿关节炎患者中的表现。二。 SF-36与特定疾病措施的比较。
4. Emotional Design II: Affective Information BehaviorResearch with Adult and Child Populations [C] . Diane Nahl, Dania Bilal, Allison Druin, Sparking synergies: bringing research and practice together . 2005

机译：情感设计II：成人和儿童群体的情感信息行为研究
5. 3-Dimensional comparison of hard and soft tissue asymmetry in adults Chinese skeletal class III malocclusions. [D] . Pan, Philip H. 2014

机译：成年中国骨骼III类错牙合的硬组织和软组织不对称性的3维比较。
6. Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II Study. [O] . H. Hemingway, M. Stafford, S. Stansfeld, 1997

机译：SF-36是衡量人口健康变化的有效方法吗？白厅II研究的结果。
7. Performance Comparison of Likert and Binary Formats of SF-36 Version 1.6 Across ECRHS II Adults Populations [O] . Grassi Mario, Nucera Andrea, Zanolin Elisabetta, 2007

机译：在ECRHS II成年人群中，李克特和SF-36版本1.6的二进制格式的性能比较
8. Scoring Methods and Measurement Properties of Health Status Measures: AnEmpirical Comparison of Summative and Item Response Theory Scoring for the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale. Abstract and Executive Summary of Dissertation [R] . Chan, K. S. 2000

机译：健康状况测量的评分方法和测量特性：sF-36物理功能量表的总结和项目反应理论评分的实证比较。论文摘要与执行摘要

Dimensionality and Summary Measures of the SF-36 v1.6: Comparison of Scale- and Item-Based Approach Across ECRHS II Adults Population

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅