首页> 外文OA文献 >Inhibitory control mechanisms and their role in task switching: A multi-methodological approach
【2h】

Inhibitory control mechanisms and their role in task switching: A multi-methodological approach

机译:抑制控制机制及其在任务切换中的作用:一种多方法论方法

摘要

Executive control allows us to ignore distraction and switch between tasks in a flexible, yet organized fashion. While a hallmark of controlled behavior, distinctions among executive control processes are not thoroughly agreed upon. The present work explored the organization of two of these executive control processes, inhibition and shifting, and their relationship to each other. There were two primary goals. The first goal was to investigate the distinction among inhibitory control processes, as “inhibition” has oftentimes been considered a unitary construct. For example, there is evidence that response-distractor inhibition, which involves resolving interference from dominant responses or distractors in the external environment, is different from resistance to proactive interference (PI), which involves overcoming interference from previously relevant representations in memory. Using aging, neuropsychology, and individual differences methodologies, I investigated the unity and diversity of inhibitory control mechanisms. The healthy aging and neuropsychological evidence supported a distinction between response-distractor inhibition and resistance to proactive interference. However, when controlling for processing speed, the individual differences work suggested a need for further specification, as only a subset of these tasks emerged in the single factor model that provided the best fit to the data. The second goal was to explore how inhibitory control processes interact with task switching, as some theoretical accounts of task switching have suggested that switch costs result from the need to overcome interference from the previously relevant task. Inconsistent with these theories, I found little relation between inhibitory control and measures of global and local task switching, and instead, working memory served as the best predictor of these shifting measures. In contrast, inhibitory control was related to the backward inhibition abilities of older adults. These findings are discussed within a theory of working memory that accounts for the patterns of results found across the different methodologies.
机译:执行控制使我们可以忽略分散注意力,并以灵活而有条理的方式在任务之间切换。尽管是受控行为的标志,但执行控制过程之间的区别尚未完全达成共识。本工作探讨了两个执行控制过程的组织,抑制和转移以及它们之间的关系。有两个主要目标。第一个目标是研究抑制控制过程之间的区别,因为“抑制”通常被认为是一个整体结构。例如,有证据表明,应对干扰物的抑制涉及解决外部环境中主要反应或干扰物的干扰,它与主动干扰(PI)的抵抗力不同,后者涉及克服内存中先前相关表示的干扰。利用衰老,神经心理学和个体差异方法,我研究了抑制控制机制的统一性和多样性。健康的衰老和神经心理学证据支持区分反应干扰物和抵抗主动干扰。但是,在控制处理速度时,个体差异工作表明需要进一步规范,因为在单因素模型中仅出现了这些任务的一部分,从而为数据提供了最佳拟合。第二个目标是探索抑制控制过程如何与任务切换交互,因为一些任务切换的理论说明表明,切换成本是由于需要克服先前相关任务的干扰而产生的。与这些理论不一致的是,我发现抑制控制与全局和局部任务切换的措施之间几乎没有关系,相反,工作记忆是这些转移措施的最佳预测指标。相反,抑制性控制与老年人的向后抑制能力有关。在工作记忆理论中讨论了这些发现,该理论解释了通过不同方法发现的结果模式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allen Corinne;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号