首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging
【2h】

The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging

机译:牙本质脱敏剂对常规和自粘树脂胶结水泥老化后剪切粘结强度的影响

摘要

This study tested the impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two conventional (RelyX ARC, Panavia 21) and two self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem, G-Cem) resin luting cements after water storage and thermocycling. Human third molars (N=880) were embedded in acrylic resin. The buccal dentin was exposed. Teeth were randomly divided into four main groups, and the following cements were adhered: 1) RelyX ARC, 2) Panavia 21, 3) RelyX Unicem, and 4) G-Cem. In half of the teeth in each group, dentin was treated with Gluma Desensitizer. In the conventional cement groups, the corresponding etchant and adhesive systems were applied. SBS of the cements was tested after 1 hour (initial); at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of water storage; and at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of thermocycling. SBS data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); this was followed by the post hoc Scheffé test and a t-test. Overall, the highest mean SBS (MPa) was obtained by RelyX ARC (ranging from 14.6 ± 3.9 to 17.6 ± 5.2) and the lowest by Panavia 21 in combination with Gluma Desensitizer (ranging from 0.0 to 2.9 ± 1.0). All tested groups with and without desensitizer showed no significant decrease after aging conditions compared with baseline values (p>0.05). Only the Panavia 21/Gluma Desensitizer combination showed a significant decrease after 4 days of thermocyling compared with initial values and 1 day thermocycling. Self-adhesive cements with Gluma Desensitizer showed increased SBS after aging conditions (ranging from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 15.2 ± 3) compared with groups without desensitizer (ranging from 2.6 ± 1.2 to 8.8 ± 2.9). No cohesive failures in dentin were observed in any of the test groups. Although self-adhesive cements with and without desensitizer presented mainly adhesive failures after water storage (95.8%) and thermocyling (100%), conventional cement (RelyX ARC) showed mainly mixed failures (90.8% and 89.2%, after water storage and thermocyling, respectively). Application of the Gluma Desensitizer to dentin before cementation had a positive effect on the SBS of self-adhesive cements.
机译:这项研究测试了Gluma脱敏剂对两种常规(RelyX ARC,Panavia 21)和两种自粘(RelyX Unicem,G-Cem)树脂胶合水泥在储水和热循环后的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。将人类的第三臼齿(N = 880)嵌入丙烯酸树脂中。颊牙本质暴露。将牙齿随机分为四个主要组,并粘附以下胶粘剂:1)RelyX ARC,2)Panavia 21、3)RelyX Unicem和4)G-Cem。在每组牙齿的一半中,牙髓用Gluma脱敏剂治疗。在常规水泥组中,使用了相应的蚀刻剂和粘合剂系统。 1小时(初始)后测试水泥的SBS;在1、4、9、16和25天的蓄水量时;以及分别在1、4、9、16和25天进行热循环。通过单向方差分析(ANOVA)分析SBS数据;随后是事后Scheffé检验和t检验。总体而言,通过RelyX ARC获得的最高平均SBS(MPa)(范围为14.6±3.9至17.6±5.2),而通过Panavia 21与Gluma脱敏剂组合获得的最低平均SBS(范围为0.0至2.9±1.0)。与基线值相比,所有老化组在有和没有脱敏剂的情况下均未显示出明显下降(p> 0.05)。与初始值和1天热循环相比,只有Panavia 21 / Gluma脱敏剂组合在热循环4天后显示出显着降低。与未使用脱敏剂的组(2.6±1.2至8.8±2.9)相比,具有Gluma脱敏剂的自粘水泥在老化条件下显示出更高的SBS(从7.4±1.4到15.2±3)。在任何测试组中均未观察到牙本质的内聚性破坏。尽管有脱敏剂和无脱敏剂的自粘水泥在储水(95.8%)和热循环(100%)后主要表现出粘结失效,而常规水泥(RelyX ARC)在储水和热循环后主要表现出混合失效(90.8%和89.2%),分别)。胶凝前在牙本质上使用Gluma脱敏剂对自粘水泥的SBS具有积极作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号