首页> 外文OA文献 >A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools
【2h】

A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools

机译:指南实施工具(GItools)理想功能的框架:Delphi对GItools的调查和评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Guidelines are the foundation for healthcare planning, delivery and quality improvement but are not consistently implemented. Few guidelines are accompanied by guideline implementation tools (GItools). Users have requested GItools, and developers have requested guidance on how to develop GItools. First it is necessary to characterize GItools. The purpose of this research was to generate a framework of desirable features of GItools. METHODS: Items representing desirable GItool features were generated by a cross-sectional survey of the international guideline community. Items were confirmed by 31 guideline developers, implementers and researchers in a two-round Delphi survey administered on the Internet. The resulting GItool framework was applied with a sample of GItools accompanying guidelines identified in the National Guideline Clearinghouse. RESULTS: The cross-sectional survey was completed by 96 respondents from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, The Netherlands, and various other countries. Seven of nine items were rated by the majority as desirable. A total of 31 panelists from 10 countries including Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States took part in a two-round Delphi survey. Ten items achieved consensus as desirable GItool features in round #1, and two additional items in round #2. A total of 13 GItools for Resource Planning, Implementation and Evaluation were identified among 149 guidelines on a variety of clinical topics (8.7%). Many GItools did not possess features considered desirable. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of higher quality GItools in guidelines is needed to support user adoption of guidelines. The GItool framework can serve as the basis for evaluating and adapting existing GItools, or developing new GItools. Further research is needed to validate the framework, develop and implement instruments by which developers can apply the framework, and specify which guidelines should be accompanied by GItools.
机译:背景:准则是医疗保健计划,交付和质量改善的基础,但并没有得到一致实施。很少有准则随附准则实施工具(GItools)。用户已请求GItools,而开发人员已请求有关如何开发GItools的指南。首先,必须表征GItools。这项研究的目的是生成GItools理想功能的框架。方法:通过国际指南界的横断面调查生成了代表理想的GItool功能的项目。 31个准则的开发人员,实施者和研究人员在Internet上进行的两轮Delphi调查中确认了这些项目。所得的GItool框架与GItools样本一起使用,该样本随附有国家指南信息交换所中确定的指南。结果:横断面调查由来自澳大利亚,加拿大,英国,美国,荷兰和其他多个国家的96名受访者完成。九项中有七项被大多数人评为满意。来自10个国家(包括澳大利亚,加拿大,德国,新西兰,秘鲁,沙特阿拉伯,西班牙,英国和美国)的31位小组成员参加了为期两轮的德尔菲调查。在第一回合中有十个项目达到了期望的GItool功能,在第二回合中又有了两个项目。在针对各种临床主题的149条指南中,共确定了13种用于资源规划,实施和评估的GItools(8.7%)。许多GItools不具备被认为合乎需要的功能。结论:需要在指南中包含更高质量的GItools以支持用户采用指南。 GItool框架可作为评估和改编现有GItools或开发新GItools的基础。需要进一步研究以验证框架,开发和实施开发人员可以应用该框架的工具,并指定GItools应随附哪些指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号