首页> 外文OA文献 >How clinicians analyze movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional survey study with Dutch allied health care professionals
【2h】

How clinicians analyze movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional survey study with Dutch allied health care professionals

机译:临床医生如何分析非特异性下腰痛患者的运动质量:与荷兰专职医疗保健专业人员进行的一项横断面调查研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Observation of movement quality (MQ) is an indelible element in the process of clinical reasoning for patients with non-specific low back pain (NS-LBP). However, the observation and evaluation of MQ in common daily activities are not standardized within allied health care. This study aims to describe how Dutch allied health care professionals (AHCPs) observe and assess MQ in patients with NS-LBP and whether AHCPs feel the need to have a specific outcome measure for assessing MQ in patients with NS-LBP. METHODS: In this cross-sectional digital survey study, Dutch primary care AHCPs (n = 114) answered one open and three closed questions about MQ in NS-LBP management. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were applied. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of the answers to the open questions revealed four main themes: 1) movement pattern features, 2) motor control features, 3) environmental influences and 4) non-verbal expressions of pain and exertion. Quantitative analyses clearly indicated that AHCPs observe MQ in the diagnostic (92%), therapeutic (91%) and evaluation phases (86%), that they do not apply any objective measurement of MQ and that 63% of the AHCPs consider it important to have a specific outcome measure to assess MQ. The AHCPs expressed added benefits and critical notes regarding clinical reasoning and quality of care. CONCLUSION: AHCPs recognize the importance of observing MQ in the assessment and management of LBP in a standardized way. However, there is no consensus amongst AHCPs how MQ should be standardized. Prior to standardization, it will be important to develop a theoretical framework to determine which observable and measurable dimensions of MQ are most valid and relevant for patients with NS-LBP to include in the assessment.
机译:背景:运动质量(MQ)的观察是非特异性下背痛(NS-LBP)患者临床推理过程中不可磨灭的要素。但是,相关日常保健活动中对MQ的观察和评估并未在相关的医疗保健中标准化。这项研究旨在描述荷兰专职医疗保健专业人员(AHCP)如何观察和评估NS-LBP患者的MQ,以及AHCP是否认为需要采用特定的结局指标来评估NS-LBP患者的MQ。方法:在这项横断面数字调查研究中,荷兰的初级保健AHCP(n = 114)回答了关于NS-LBP管理中MQ的一个开放性问题和三个封闭性问题。进行了定性和定量分析。结果:对公开问题答案的定性分析揭示了四个主要主题:1)运动模式特征,2)运动控制特征,3)环境影响和4)疼痛和劳累的非语言表达。定量分析清楚地表明,AHCP在诊断阶段(92%),治疗阶段(91%)和评估阶段(86%)观察到MQ,他们没有对MQ进行任何客观的测量,并且63%的AHCP认为对MQ很重要。有一个评估MQ的特定结果度量。 AHCP在临床推理和护理质量方面增加了好处并提出了重要说明。结论:AHCP认识到在标准化的LBP评估和管理中遵守MQ的重要性。但是,AHCP之间尚未达成共识,即如何标准化MQ。在标准化之前,重要的是要建立一个理论框架,以确定哪些可观察和可测量的MQ量对评估中包括的NS-LBP患者最有效和最相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号