首页> 外文OA文献 >Explaining participation differentials in Dutch higher education: The impact of subjective success probabilities on level choice and field choice
【2h】

Explaining participation differentials in Dutch higher education: The impact of subjective success probabilities on level choice and field choice

机译:解释荷兰高等教育中的参与差异:主观成功概率对水平选择和领域选择的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article we examine whether subjective estimates of success probabilities explain the effect of social origin, sex, and ethnicity on students' choices between different school tracks in Dutch higher education. The educational options analysed differ in level (i.e. university versus professional college) and fields of study (i.e. science versus non-science). First we analyse students' self-assessed success probabilities for specific tracks in higher education. We hypothesize that differences in demonstrated academic ability explain these perceived success probabilities. Next, we test whether these success probabilities contribute to explaining educational decisions and differentials herein with respect to social background, sex, and ethnicity. We use the Dutch Participation in Higher Education dataset wave 1995 and 1997 to answer our questions. Success probabilities differ across social origins, between men and women, and across ethnic groups, even after controlling for ability differences. Success probabilities contribute to the explanatory model for school transition decisions which differ by field of study and level of schooling. They also help to explain social origin and sex-based differentials in field choice, but not in level choice. Ability is not a sufficient indicator for self-perceived success probabilities: success probabilities explain educational differentials better than ability.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了成功概率的主观估计是否可以解释社会起源,性别和种族对荷兰高等教育中不同学校道路之间学生选择的影响。分析的教育选择在水平(即大学与专业学院)和研究领域(即科学与非科学)之间有所不同。首先,我们分析学生在高等教育中特定领域的自我评估成功概率。我们假设证明的学术能力差异解释了这些感知的成功概率。接下来,我们测试这些成功概率是否有助于解释教育决策以及此处关于社会背景,性别和种族的差异。我们使用1995年和1997年荷兰参与高等教育的数据集来回答我们的问题。即使在控制了能力差异之后,成功概率也会因社会出身,男女之间以及种族群体而异。成功概率为学校过渡决策的解释模型做出了贡献,该模型因学习领域和学校水平而异。它们还有助于解释田野选择而非等级选择中的社会出身和基于性别的差异。能力不是自我感知的成功概率的充分指标:成功概率比能力更好地解释了教育差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号