首页> 外文OA文献 >Provision of family planning services in Tanzania: A comparative analysis of public and private facilities
【2h】

Provision of family planning services in Tanzania: A comparative analysis of public and private facilities

机译:在坦桑尼亚提供计划生育服务:对公共和私人设施的比较分析

摘要

Adherence to the policy guidelines and standards is necessary for family planning services. We compared public and private facilities in terms of provision of family planning services. We analyzed data from health facility questionnaire of the 2006 Tanzania Service Provision Assessment survey, based on 529 health facilities. Majority of public facilities (95.4%) offered family planning services, whereas more than half of private facilities (52.1%) did not offer those. Public facilities were more likely to offer modern contraceptives as compared to private facilities. However, private facilities were more likely to offer counseling on natural methods of family planning [AOR = 2.12 (1.15-3.92), P or = 0.001]. Public facilities were more likely to report having guidelines or protocols for family planning services and various kinds of visual aids for family planning and STIs when compared to private facilities. This comparative analysis entails the need to enforce the standards of family planning services in Tanzania.
机译:计划生育服务必须遵守政策准则和标准。我们在提供计划生育服务方面比较了公共和私人设施。我们基于529个卫生机构,对2006年坦桑尼亚服务提供评估调查中的卫生机构问卷调查数据进行了分析。大多数公共设施(95.4%)提供计划生育服务,而超过一半的私人设施(52.1%)不提供计划生育服务。与私人设施相比,公共设施更有可能提供现代避孕药具。但是,私人机构更有可能就自然计划生育方法提供咨询[AOR = 2.12(1.15-3.92),P <或= 0.001]。与私人设施相比,公共设施更有可能报告有计划生育服务的指南或协议,以及计划生育和性传播感染的各种视觉辅助工具。这项比较分析需要在坦桑尼亚执行计划生育服务的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号