首页> 外文OA文献 >Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations
【2h】

Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations

机译:句子理解过程中语法与语义之间的相互作用:句法与语义冲突相结合的ERP效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the effects of combined semantic and syntactic violations in relation to the effects of single semantic and single syntactic violations on language-related event-related brain potential (ERP) effects (N400 and P600/ SPS). Syntactic violations consisted of a mismatch in grammatical gender or number features of the definite article and the noun in sentence-internal or sentence-final noun phrases (NPs). Semantic violations consisted of semantically implausible adjective–noun combinations in the same NPs. Combined syntactic and semantic violations were a summation of these two respective violation types. ERPs were recorded while subjects read the sentences with the different types of violations and the correct control sentences. ERP effects were computed relative to ERPs elicited by the sentence-internal or sentence-final nouns. The size of the N400 effect to the semantic violation was increased by an additional syntactic violation (the syntactic boost). In contrast, the size of the P600/ SPS to the syntactic violation was not affected by an additional semantic violation. This suggests that in the absence of syntactic ambiguity, the assignment of syntactic structure is independent of semantic context. However, semantic integration is influenced by syntactic processing. In the sentence-final position, additional global processing consequences were obtained as a result of earlier violations in the sentence. The resulting increase in the N400 amplitude to sentence-final words was independent of the nature of the violation. A speeded anomaly detection task revealed that it takes substantially longer to detect semantic than syntactic anomalies. These results are discussed in relation to the latency and processing characteristics of the N400 and P600/SPS effects. Overall, the results reveal an asymmetry in the interplay between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
机译:这项研究调查了语义和句法组合违规的影响,以及与语言相关的事件相关的大脑潜能(ERP)效果(N400和P600 / SPS)有关的单个语义和单个句法违规的影响。句法违规由定冠词的语法性别或数量特征与句子内部或句子最终名词短语(NP)中的名词不匹配组成。语义违规由相同NP中的语义上难以置信的形容词-名词组合组成。组合的语法和语义违规是这两种违规类型的总和。当受试者阅读具有不同类型的违规行为和正确的控制语句的句子时,会记录ERP。相对于句子内部或句子最终名词引起的ERP来计算ERP效果。 N400对语义违规的影响的大小因其他语法违规(语法增强)而增加。相反,P600 / SPS的语法违规大小不受其他语义违规影响。这表明在没有句法歧义的情况下,句法结构的分配与语义上下文无关。但是,语义集成受句法处理的影响。在判决的最后阶段,由于较早地违反了判决,因此获得了其他全局处理结果。 N400幅度增加到最终单词的数量与违规的性质无关。加快的异常检测任务表明,与语法异常相比,检测语义所需的时间要长得多。讨论了有关N400和P600 / SPS效果的延迟和处理特性的这些结果。总体而言,结果揭示了在线句子理解过程中语法和语义之间相互作用的不对称性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hagoort P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号