首页> 外文OA文献 >Australia's embrace of the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention: How the judiciary's narrow interpretation of the 'grave risk of harm' exception harms abused taking mothers and their children
【2h】

Australia's embrace of the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention: How the judiciary's narrow interpretation of the 'grave risk of harm' exception harms abused taking mothers and their children

机译:澳大利亚对1980年《海牙绑架公约》的接受:司法机构对“严重伤害危险”例外的狭义解释如何伤害被虐待的母亲及其子女

摘要

This thesis explored how Australian courts have dealt with a recent surge in international parental child abductions by primary carer mothers escaping domestic violence perpetrated by their children’s father. This area of the law is governed by the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention, implemented by Australia in 1986. A selection of reported cases decided between 2005 and 2015 where the “Grave Risk of Harm” defence was raised by the mother was analysed. The conclusion was that Australian courts generally apply the Convention narrowly to all cases, even domestic violence cases, and that this approach can adversely affect abused women and children.
机译:本文探讨了澳大利亚法院如何应对近来国际上育儿的绑架案,这些案子是由主要的有照顾者的母亲规避了其子女父亲所犯下的家庭暴力。该法律领域受澳大利亚于1986年实施的1980年《海牙绑架公约》的管辖。在2005年至2015年间,对一些举报案件进行了选择,其中分析了母亲提出的“严重危害危害”辩护。结论是,澳大利亚法院通常将《公约》狭义地适用于所有案件,即使是家庭暴力案件,这种做法也会对受虐待的妇女和儿童产生不利影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Masterton Gina H.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号