首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study on optimizing the wind farm layout using different design methods and cost models
【2h】

Comparative study on optimizing the wind farm layout using different design methods and cost models

机译:使用不同的设计方法和成本模型优化风电场布局的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Optimizing wind farm layout is an effective tool to decrease wind power losses caused by the wake interaction between wind turbines. Current researches focus on advancing the optimization algorithms and improving the wind farm models based on two design methods (the grid based method and the unrestricted coordinate method). However, it has been rarely reported for the comparative studies of these two methods. Meanwhile, the topic of how to select a better wind farm cost model for the layout optimization has not been studied in literatures, while it is extremely important to the real wind farm design since the real wind farm cost can be highly uncertain which cannot be represented by a fixed model for different wind farms. Therefore, the wind farm layout optimization using the two design methods is conducted in this paper. Three different grid situations are considered so that the best optimization results with the grid based method can be obtained to compare with the unrestricted coordinate method more convincingly. Two widely acceptable cost models (Mosetti's model and Chen's model) are employed to unveil their influence on the optimization results. It has been found that:udud - (i) 20×20 grids should be preferred for the grid based method instead of the previously widely applied 10×10 grids; udud - (ii) compared to using the grid based method, there is a small improvement for the optimization result using the unrestricted coordinate method. Nevertheless, more computation cost is needed for the method when a large number of turbines are optimized, and; udud - (iii) there is a big discrepancy between the optimization with different cost models. Mosetti's cost model is more accurate than Chen's cost model when the optimized number of turbines is large and vise versa.
机译:优化风电场布局是减少由风力涡轮机之间的尾流相互作用引起的风能损失的有效工具。当前的研究集中在基于两种设计方法(基于网格的方法和无限制坐标方法)的基础上,改进优化算法和改进风电场模型。但是,很少有关于这两种方法的比较研究的报道。同时,关于如何为布局优化选择更好的风电场成本模型的话题尚未进行过研究,而对于实际的风电场设计却极为重要,因为实际的风电场成本可能非常不确定,无法表示。通过针对不同风电场的固定模型。因此,本文采用两种设计方法对风电场布局进行了优化。考虑了三种不同的网格情况,以便可以使用基于网格的方法获得最佳的优化结果,从而更令人信服地与无限制坐标方法进行比较。两种可以广泛接受的成本模型(Mosetti模型和Chen模型)被用来揭示它们对优化结果的影响。已经发现: ud ud-(i)对于基于网格的方法,应该首选20×20网格,而不是先前广泛应用的10×10网格; ud ud-(ii)与使用基于网格的方法相比,使用无限制坐标法的优化结果有很小的改进。然而,当优化大量涡轮机时,该方法需要更多的计算成本,并且; ud ud-(iii)不同成本模型的优化之间存在很大差异。当涡轮机的优化数量很大时,Mosetti的成本模型比Chen的成本模型更为准确,反之亦然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号