首页> 外文OA文献 >The links between public tendencies and the urban design framework of Brisbane’s public squares: Mapping urban design frameworks present in Brisbane public squares and the correlating activities of the Australian public
【2h】

The links between public tendencies and the urban design framework of Brisbane’s public squares: Mapping urban design frameworks present in Brisbane public squares and the correlating activities of the Australian public

机译:公共趋势与布里斯班公共广场的城市设计框架之间的联系:绘制布里斯班公共广场中存在的城市设计框架以及澳大利亚公众的相关活动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research seeks to demonstrate the ways in which urban design factors, individually and in various well-considered arrangements, stimulate and encourage social activities in Brisbane’s public squares through the mapping and analysis of user behaviour. No design factors contribute to public space in isolation, so the combinations of different design factors, contextual and social impacts as well as local climate are considered to be highly influential to the way in which Brisbane’s public engages with public space. It is this local distinctiveness that this research seeks to ascertain. The research firstly pinpoints and consolidates theuddesign factors identified and recommended in existing literature and then maps the identified factors as they are observed at case study sites in Brisbane. This is then set against observational mappings of the site’sudcorresponding user activities and engagement. These mappings identify a number of patterns of behaviour;udpertinently that “activated” areas of social gathering actively draw people in, and the busier a space is, both the frequency and duration of people lingering in the space increases. The study finds that simply providing respite from the urban environment (and/or weather conditions) does not adequately encourage social interaction and that people friendly design factors can instigate social activities which, if coexisting in a public space, can themselves draw in further users of the space. One of the primary conclusions drawn from these observations is that members of the public in Brisbane are both actively and passively social and often seek out locations where “people-watching” and being around other members of the public (both categorised as passive social activities) are facilitated and encouraged. Spaces that provide respite from the urban environment but that do not sufficiently accommodate social connections and activities are less favourable and are often left abandoned despite their comparable tranquillity and available space.
机译:这项研究旨在通过绘制和分析用户行为,论证城市设计因素如何以各种方式以及经过周密考虑的各种方式刺激和鼓励布里斯班公共广场的社交活动。没有设计因素会孤立地影响公共空间,因此,不同设计因素,背景和社会影响以及当地气候的组合被认为对布里斯班公众与公共空间互动的方式有很大影响。本研究试图确定的正是这种地方特色。该研究首先查明并巩固了现有文献中确定和推荐的 uddesign因素,然后绘制了在布里斯班案例研究现场观察到的确定因素的地图。然后,根据网站不相称的用户活动和参与度的观察性映射设置该值。这些映射确定了许多行为模式; 恰恰是,社交聚会的“激活”区域积极地吸引人们进入,并且空间更加忙碌,人们在空间中徘徊的频率和持续时间都在增加。该研究发现,仅仅从城市环境(和/或天气条件)中获得喘息并不能充分鼓励社会互动,而人们友好的设计因素可以引发社会活动,如果这些活动在公共场所共存,则可以吸引更多的用户使用。空间。从这些观察得出的主要结论之一是,布里斯班的公众成员都是主动和被动的社会成员,并且经常寻找“人们监视”并与其他公众成员在一起的地点(均被归类为被动的社会活动)。得到促进和鼓励。能够从城市环境中获得喘息的空间,但不能充分容纳社交联系和活动的空间则较不受欢迎,尽管它们具有相当的宁静性和可用空间,但常常被抛弃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号