首页> 外文OA文献 >Do community-wide interventions increase physical activity? S1TEP
【2h】

Do community-wide interventions increase physical activity? S1TEP

机译:社区范围的干预措施会增加体育锻炼吗? S1TEP

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundududNot getting enough physical activity leads to poorer health. Regular physical activity can reduce the risk of chronic disease and improve one’s health and well-being. The lack of physical activity is a common and growing problem in many countries. We sought to evaluate the effects of community wide, multi-strategic interventions upon the physical activity patterns of populations.ududMethodududWe undertook a Cochrane Systematic Review which included an extensive search of databases, including studies which met pre-determined criteria, and conducted independent risk of bias assessment and data extraction.ududResultsududAfter the selection process, 25 studies were included in the review. The strategies varied by the number and type of components and their intensity. No studies were identified as low risk of bias. Sixteen studies were identified as having a high risk of bias and thus untrustworthy. Nine studies were of considered to have an unclear risk of bias and some studies held back data they collected. The effects reported were inconsistent across the studies and the measures. Some of the better designed studies showed no improvement in measures of physical activity. Interventions which have an environmental change component seemed to be a promising direction. Those interventions which were primarily a mass media campaign were less likely to be successful.ududConclusionsududAlthough numerous studies have been undertaken, there is considerable inconsistency in the findings of the available studies and this is confounded by serious methodological issues within the included studies. Simply combining interventions does not necessarily result in increased physical activity as many such studies, including some long term programs, failed to demonstrate efficacy. There is a clear need for well-designed studies and these studies should focus on the quality of measurement of physical activity. The review is currently being updated with newer studies.
机译:背景 ud ud运动量不足会导致健康状况恶化。有规律的体育锻炼可以减少患慢性病的风险,并改善人们的健康和福祉。在许多国家,缺乏体育锻炼是一个普遍且日益严重的问题。我们试图评估社区广泛的多策略干预措施对人群身体活动模式的影响。 ud udMethod ud ud我们进行了Cochrane系统评价,其中包括对数据库的广泛搜索,包括符合预定条件的研究标准,并进行了偏倚评估和数据提取的独立风险。 ud ud结果 ud ud在选择过程之后,该评价纳入了25项研究。这些策略因组件的数量和类型及其强度而异。没有研究被确定为偏倚风险低。十六项研究被确定具有偏见的高风险,因此是不可信的。九项研究被认为具有偏见风险尚不清楚,一些研究保留了他们收集的数据。报道的影响在整个研究和措施中不一致。一些设计更好的研究表明,体育锻炼的措施没有改善。具有环境变化成分的干预似乎是一个有希望的方向。虽然主要进行了大众媒体宣传,但这些干预措施不太可能成功。 ud ud结论 ud ud尽管已进行了大量研究,但现有研究的结果存在相当大的不一致,这与内部严重的方法学问题相混淆。包含的研究。简单地组合干预措施并不一定会导致运动量增加,因为许多此类研究(包括一些长期计划)未能证明疗效。显然需要精心设计的研究,并且这些研究应侧重于身体活动的测量质量。该评论目前正在更新,以更新的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号