首页> 外文OA文献 >An exploration of knowledge management and intellectual capital in a nonprofit organisation context
【2h】

An exploration of knowledge management and intellectual capital in a nonprofit organisation context

机译:在非营利组织中探索知识管理和智力资本

摘要

In recent years, practitioners and researchers alike have turned their attention to knowledge management (KM) in order to increase organisational performance (OP). As a result, many different approaches and strategies have been investigated and suggested for how knowledge should be managed to make organisations more effective and efficient. However, most research has been undertaken in the for-profit sector, with only a few studies focusing on the benefits nonprofit organisations might gain by managing knowledge. This study broadly investigates the impact of knowledge management on the organisational performance of nonprofit organisations. ududOrganisational performance can be evaluated through either financial or non-financial measurements. In order to evaluate knowledge management and organisational performance, non-financial measurements are argued to be more suitable given that knowledge is an intangible asset which often cannot be expressed through financial indicators. Non-financial measurement concepts of performance such as the balanced scorecard or the concept of Intellectual Capital (IC) are well accepted and used within the for-profit and nonprofit sectors to evaluate organisational performance. This study utilised the concept of IC as the method to evaluate KM and OP in the context of nonprofit organisations due to the close link between KM and IC: Indeed, KM is concerned with managing the KM processes of creating, storing, sharing and applying knowledge and the organisational KM infrastructure such as organisational culture or organisational structure to support these processes. On the other hand, IC measures the knowledge stocks in different ontological levels: at the individual level (human capital), at the group level (relational capital) and at the organisational level (structural capital). In other words, IC measures the value of the knowledge which has been managed through KM.ududAs KM encompasses the different KM processes and the KM infrastructure facilitating these processes, previous research has investigated the relationship between KM infrastructure and KM processes. Organisational culture, organisational structure and the level of IT support have been identified as the main factors of the KM infrastructure influencing the KM processes of creating, storing, sharing and applying knowledge. Other research has focused on the link between KM and OP or organisational effectiveness. Based on existing literature, a theoretical model was developed to enable the investigation of the relation between KM (encompassing KM infrastructure and KM processes) and IC. The model assumes an association between KM infrastructure and KM processes, as well as an association between KM processes and the various levels of IC (human capital, structural capital and relational capital). As a result, five research questions (RQ) with respect to the various factors of the KM infrastructure as well as with respect to the relationship between KM infrastructure and IC were raised and included into the research model: ududRQ 1Do nonprofit organisations which have a Hierarchy culture have a stronger IT support than nonprofit organisations which have an Adhocracy culture?udRQ 2Do nonprofit organisations which have a centralised organisational structure have a stronger IT support than nonprofit organisations which have decentralised organisational structure?udRQ 3Do nonprofit organisations which have a stronger IT support have a higher value of Human Capital than nonprofit organisations which have a less strong IT support?udRQ 4Do nonprofit organisations which have a stronger IT support have a higher value of Structural Capital than nonprofit organisations which have a less strong IT support?udRQ 5Do nonprofit organisations which have a stronger IT support have a higher value of Relational Capital than nonprofit organisations which have a less strong IT support?ududIn order to investigate the research questions, measurements for IC were developed which were linked to the main KM processes. The final KM/IC model contained four items for evaluating human capital, five items for evaluating structural capital and four items for evaluating relational capital.ududThe research questions were investigated through empirical research using a case study approach with the focus on two nonprofit organisations providing trade promotions services through local offices worldwide. Data for the investigation of the assumptions were collected via qualitative as well as quantitative research methods. The qualitative study included interviews with representatives of the two participating organisations as well as in-depth document research. The purpose of the qualitative study was to investigate the factors of the KM infrastructure (organisational culture, organisational structure, IT support) of the organisations and how these factors were related to each other. On the other hand, the quantitative study was carried out through an online-survey amongst staff of the various local offices. The purpose of the quantitative study was to investigate which impact the level of IT support, as the main instrument of the KM infrastructure, had on IC. ududOverall several key themes were found as a result of the study:ud•Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital were complementary with each other, which should be expressed through measurements of IC based on KM processes.ud•The various factors of the KM infrastructure (organisational culture, organisational structure and level of IT support) are interdependent.ud•IT was a primary instrument through which the different KM processes (creating, storing, sharing and applying knowledge) were performed.ud•A high level of IT support was evident when participants reported higher level of IC (human capital, structural capital and relational capital).ududThe study supported previous research in the field of KM and replicated the findings from other case studies in this area. The study also contributed to theory by placing the KM research within the nonprofit context and analysing the linkage between KM and IC. From the managerial perspective, the findings gave clear indications that would allow interested parties, such as nonprofit managers or consultants to understand more about the implications of KM on OP and to use this knowledge for implementing efficient and effective KM strategies within their organisations.
机译:近年来,从业人员和研究人员都将注意力转向知识管理(KM),以提高组织绩效(OP)。结果,已经研究了许多不同的方法和策略,并提出了有关如何管理知识以提高组织效率和效率的建议。但是,大多数研究是在营利性部门进行的,只有少数研究侧重于非营利组织通过管理知识可能获得的利益。这项研究广泛地调查了知识管理对非营利组织的组织绩效的影响。 ud ud组织绩效可以通过财务或非财务指标进行评估。为了评估知识管理和组织绩效,认为知识是一种无形资产,通常无法通过财务指标来表示,因此非财务指标被认为更为合适。非财务绩效考核概念,例如平衡计分卡或智力资本(IC)概念,在营利性和非营利部门中得到了广泛接受并用于评估组织绩效。由于KM和IC之间的紧密联系,因此本研究利用IC概念来评估非营利组织中的KM和OP:确实,KM与管理KM创建,存储,共享和应用知识的过程有关组织的KM基础架构(例如组织文化或组织结构)来支持这些流程。另一方面,IC在不同的本体论级别上测量知识储备:个人级别(人力资本),群体级别(关系资本)和组织级别(结构资本)。换句话说,IC衡量的是通过KM管理的知识的价值。 ud ud由于KM涵盖了不同的KM流程以及促进这些流程的KM基础架构,因此先前的研究已经调查了KM基础架构与KM流程之间的关系。组织文化,组织结构和IT支持水平已被确定为KM基础架构影响KM创建,存储,共享和应用知识过程的主要因素。其他研究集中在KM和OP或组织有效性之间的联系上。根据现有文献,开发了一种理论模型以研究KM(包括KM基础设施和KM流程)与IC之间的关系。该模型假设KM基础设施和KM流程之间存在关联,并且KM流程与IC的各个级别(人力资本,结构资本和关系资本)之间存在关联。结果,提出了关于KM基础设施的各种因素以及KM基础设施与IC之间的关系的五个研究问题(RQ),并将其纳入研究模型: ud udRQ 1非营利组织 udRQ 2具有集中化组织结构的非营利组织是否比具有分散组织结构的非营利组织具有更强的IT支持? udRQ 2非组织性组织比具有Ad hocracy文化的非营利组织具有更强的IT支持? udRQ 2非营利组织具有较弱IT支持的组织比具有较弱IT支持的非盈利组织具有更高的人力资本价值? udRQ 4具有较强大IT支持的非盈利组织是否比具有较弱IT支持的非盈利组织具有更高的结构化资本价值? udRQ 5拥有更强大的IT支持的非营利组织是否对您有帮助?与非IT组织相比,Relational Capital的价值是否更高?非IT组织对IT支持的支持程度较低? ud ud为了调查研究问题,开发了与主要KM流程相关的IC测量。最终的KM / IC模型包含四项用于评估人力资本的项目,五项用于评估结构性资本的项目和四项用于关系性资本的项目。 ud ud通过案例研究,以两个非营利组织为重点,通过实证研究对研究问题进行了研究。组织通过全球各地的办事处提供贸易促销服务。通过定性和定量研究方法收集有关假设调查的数据。定性研究包括对两个参与组织代表的访谈以及深入的文献研究。定性研究的目的是调查组织的KM基础架构的因素(组织文化,组织结构,IT支持)以及这些因素如何相互关联。另一方面,该定量研究是通过在线调查在各个地方办事处的员工中进行的。定量研究的目的是调查作为KM基础架构主要工具的IT支持水平对IC的影响。 ud ud这项研究发现了以下几个关键主题: ud•知识管理和智力资本是相辅相成的,应该通过基于KM过程的IC测量来表达。 ud•知识管理基础架构(组织文化,组织结构和IT支持水平)是相互依赖的。 ud•IT是执行不同知识管理流程(创建,存储,共享和应用知识)的主要工具。 ud•当参与者报告较高的IC(人力资本,结构资本和关系资本)水平时,IT支持水平就很明显。 ud ud这项研究支持KM领域的先前研究,并复制了该领域其他案例研究的结果。这项研究还通过将KM研究置于非营利性背景下并分析了KM和IC之间的联系,为理论做出了贡献。从管理的角度来看,这些发现给出了明确的迹象,使有关各方(例如非营利经理或顾问)可以更多地了解知识管理对OP的影响,并利用这些知识在其组织内实施有效的知识管理策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Quink Ute;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号