Packaged software is pre-built with the intention of licensing it to users in domestic settings and work organisations. This thesis focuses upon the work organisation where packaged software has been characterised as one of the latest ‘solutions’ to the problems of information systems. The study investigates the packaged software selection process that has, to date, been largely viewed as objective and rational. In contrast, this interpretive study is based on a 21⁄2 year long field study of organisational experiences with packaged software selection at T.Co, a consultancy organisation based in the United Kingdom.ududEmerging from the iterative process of case study and action research is an alternative theory of packaged software selection. The research argues that packaged software selection is far from the rationalistic and linear process that previous studies suggest. Instead, the study finds that aspects of the traditional process of selection incorporating the activities of gathering requirements, evaluation and selection based on ‘best fit’ may or may not take place. Furthermore, even where these aspects occur they may not have equal weight or impact upon implementation and usage as may be expected. This is due to the influence of those multiple realities which originate from the organisational and market environments within which packages are created, selected and used, the lack of homogeneity in organisational contexts and the variously interpreted characteristics of the package in question.
展开▼
机译:打包软件是预先构建的,旨在将其许可给家庭环境和工作机构中的用户。本文着重于工作组织,其中打包软件已被描述为解决信息系统问题的最新“解决方案”之一。这项研究调查了迄今为止被认为是客观和合理的打包软件选择过程。相比之下,这项解释性研究是基于T.Co(总部位于英国的咨询组织)对组织经验以及打包软件选择进行的长达21⁄2年的实地研究。 ud ud来自案例研究和案例研究的迭代过程行动研究是打包软件选择的另一种理论。该研究认为,打包软件的选择与先前研究表明的理性和线性过程相去甚远。取而代之的是,该研究发现,传统的选择过程结合了收集需求,评估和基于“最佳匹配”的选择活动,这些方面可能会也可能不会发生。此外,即使发生这些方面,它们也可能不会像预期的那样具有相等的权重或对实现和使用的影响。这是由于以下多种现实的影响,这些现实来自在其中创建,选择和使用软件包的组织和市场环境,组织环境中缺乏同质性以及所讨论软件包的各种解释特征。
展开▼