首页> 外文OA文献 >Barriers to the acceptance of road safety programmes among rural road users : developing a brief intervention
【2h】

Barriers to the acceptance of road safety programmes among rural road users : developing a brief intervention

机译:农村道路使用者接受道路安全计划的障碍:制定简短的干预措施

摘要

Motorised countries have more fatal road crashes in rural areas than in urban areas. In Australia, over two thirds of the population live in urban areas, yet approximately 55 percent of the road fatalities occur in rural areas (ABS, 2006; Tziotis, Mabbot, Edmonston, Sheehan & Dwyer, 2005). Road and environmental factors increase the challenges of rural driving, but do not fully account for the disparity. Rural drivers are less compliant with recommendations regarding the “fatal four” behaviours of speeding, drink driving, seatbelt non-use and fatigue, and the reasons for their lower apparent receptivity for road safety messages are not well understood.ududCountermeasures targeting driver behaviour that have been effective in reducing road crashes in urban areas have been less successful in rural areas (FORS, 1995). However, potential barriers to receptivity for road safety information among rural road users have not been systematically investigated.ududThis thesis aims to develop a road safety countermeasure that addresses three areas that potentially affect receptivity to rural road safety information. The first is psychological barriers of road users’ attitudes, including risk evaluation, optimism bias, locus of control and readiness to change. A second area is the timing and method of intervention delivery, which includes the production of a brief intervention and the feasibility of delivering it at a “teachable moment”. The third area under investigation is the content of the brief intervention. This study describes the process of developing an intervention that includes content to address road safety attitudes and improve safety behaviours of rural road users regarding the “fatal four”.ududThe research commences with a review of the literature on rural road crashes, brief interventions, intervention design and implementation, and potential psychological barriers to receptivity. This literature provides a rationale for the development of a brief intervention for rural road safety with a focus on driver attitudes and behaviour.ududThe research is then divided into four studies. The primary aim of Study One and Study Two is to investigate the receptivity of rural drivers to road safety interventions, with a view to identifying barriers to the efficacy of these strategies.
机译:机动车国家在农村地区的致命交通事故多于城市地区。在澳大利亚,超过三分之二的人口居住在城市地区,但约有55%的道路交通事故死亡发生在农村地区(ABS,2006年; Tziotis,Mabbot,Edmonston,Sheehan&Dwyer,2005年)。道路和环境因素增加了农村驾驶的挑战,但并不能完全解决这一差距。农村驾驶员不太遵守有关超速,酒后驾驶,不使用安全带和疲劳的“致命四项”行为的建议,人们对道路安全信息的表观接受度较低的原因也未得到很好的理解。 ud ud针对驾驶员的对策有效减少城市道路交通事故的行为在农村地区不太成功(FORS,1995)。但是,尚未对农村道路使用者对道路安全信息接受性的潜在障碍进行系统研究。 ud ud本文旨在制定一种道路安全对策,以解决可能影响农村道路安全信息接受性的三个领域。首先是道路使用者态度上的心理障碍,包括风险评估,乐观偏见,控制源和改变的意愿。第二个领域是干预措施的实施时间和方法,其中包括进行简短的干预措施以及在“可教的时刻”进行干预的可行性。调查的第三个领域是简短干预的内容。这项研究描述了开发干预措施的过程,其中包括解决道路交通安全态度和改善农村道路使用者关于“致命四人”的安全行为的内容。 ud ud研究首先回顾了有关农村道路交通事故的文献,内容简介干预措施,干预措施的设计和实施以及潜在的接受心理障碍。该文献为发展针对农村道路安全的简短干预措施提供了理论依据,重点是驾驶员的态度和行为。 ud ud然后将研究分为四项研究。研究一和研究二的主要目的是调查农村驾驶员对道路安全干预措施的接受程度,以期找出阻碍这些策略有效性的障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sticher Gayle;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号