首页> 外文OA文献 >Establishing indigeneity in African pluralities using PRO169 parameters and a case study for measuring their inclusivity
【2h】

Establishing indigeneity in African pluralities using PRO169 parameters and a case study for measuring their inclusivity

机译:使用PRO169参数建立非洲多元性的土著性并衡量其包容性的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The concept of the indigenous person or group in Africa is a contentious one. The current argument is that there exist no indigenous people in Africa because all Africans are indigenous. The obverse considers those Africans who have not been touched by colonialism and lost their traditional cultures commensurate with attachments to the lands or a distinguishable traditional lifestyle to be indigenous. This paper argues in favor of the latter. People who live in the global telos and do not participate in a distinct traditional culture that has been attached to the land for centuries are not indigenous. It is argued that this cultural divergence between modern and traditional is the major identifying point to settle the indigenous-non indigenous African debate. Finally, the paper looks at inclusive development and provides a new political analysis model for quantifying inclusivity so as to measure the inclusivity of indigenous peoples.
机译:非洲土著人或群体的概念是一个有争议的概念。当前的论点是,非洲没有土著人民,因为所有非洲人都是土著。正面认为那些没有被殖民主义感动并失去与土地依恋或与众不同的传统生活方式相称的传统文化的非洲人是土著。本文主张后者。生活在全球端粒中且未参与已有数百年历史的独特传统文化的人并非土著。有人认为,现代与传统之间的文化差异是解决非洲土著与非土著辩论的主要标志。最后,本文着眼于包容性发展,并提供了一种新的政治分析模型来量化包容性,从而衡量土著人民的包容性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gagnon Jean-Paul;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号