首页> 外文OA文献 >Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grants process: How sticky is the flypaper effect?
【2h】

Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grants process: How sticky is the flypaper effect?

机译:财政幻想和澳大利亚地方政府的拨款程序:蝇纸效果有多粘?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been argued that evidence supporting the widely documented flypaper effect is a statistical artefact; more specifically that previous studies are compromised by the use of inappropriate functional forms and the endogeneity of intergovernmental grant programs. Whilst the first issue may be resolved with careful econometric testing, the second requires the incorporation of institutional constraints into governmental expenditure equations. Combining Australian local government expenditure equations and intergovernmental grant parameters, the flypaper controversy is analysed. Empirical results confirm the sensitivity of the flypaper effect to specification, and tests of fit unambiguously favour one functional form. That specification yields no evidence of a flypaper effect in the Australian institutional milieu.
机译:有人认为,支持广泛记录的飞纸效应的证据是一种统计伪像;更具体地说,以前的研究因使用不适当的功能形式和政府间拨款计划的内生性而受到损害。尽管第一个问题可以通过仔细的计量经济学测试解决,但第二个问题则需要将制度约束纳入政府支出方程中。结合澳大利亚地方政府的支出公式和政府间拨款参数,对蝇纸的争议进行了分析。经验结果证实了飞纸效果对规格的敏感性,而贴合度测试明确地偏向一种功能形式。该规范没有证据表明在澳大利亚的机构环境中有蝇纸效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号