首页> 外文OA文献 >Creative industries as policy and discourse outside the United Kingdom
【2h】

Creative industries as policy and discourse outside the United Kingdom

机译:创意产业作为英国以外的政策和讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Media, cultural and communication studies' critique of the concept of creative industries as policy discourse has been as consistent as it has been negative. The gap between the remarkable enthusiasm with which it has been taken up in policy circles across many parts of the world and at manyudlevels (national, state, regional, supranational), and the depth of opposition to it academically, marks it out as a major contemporary instance of the gap between policy and critique (Cunningham, 1992).udInterestingly, though, almost all of this critique has been focused on the British policy environment, and as such betrays a remarkably metropolitanist bias. This brief overview of policy situations elsewhere in the world offers an interesting case study in internationalizing mediaudstudies, comparing their 'problematics' with those identified by Garnham as foundational to the creative industries discourse.
机译:媒体,文化和传播研究对创意产业作为政策论述的概念的批评既一致又否定。在世界许多地方和许多 udlevel(国家,州,地区,超国家)的政策圈中,人们对它表现出极大的热情与学术界的强烈反对之间的差距,标志着这是当代政策与批评之间差距的一个主要实例(坎宁安,1992)。 ud有趣的是,几乎所有的批评都集中在英国的政策环境上,因此背叛了大都市主义的偏见。对世界其他地方的政策情况的简要概述提供了一个有趣的案例研究,以使媒体研究国际化,将其“问题”与Garnham认为是创意产业话语的基础进行比较。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cunningham Stuart D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号