首页> 外文OA文献 >Young drivers’ optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill : accountability and insight experience manipulations
【2h】

Young drivers’ optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill : accountability and insight experience manipulations

机译:年轻驾驶员对事故风险和驾驶技能的乐观偏见:问责制和洞察力经验操纵

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to determine whether two brief, low cost interventions would reduce young drivers’ optimism bias for their driving skills and accident risk perceptions. This tendency for such drivers to perceive themselves as more skilful and less prone to driving accidents than their peers may lead to less engagement in precautionary driving behaviours and a greater engagement in more dangerous driving behaviour. 243 young drivers (aged 17 - 25 years) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: accountability, insight or control. All participants provided both overall and specific situation ratings of their driving skills and accident risk relative to a typical young driver. Prior to completing the questionnaire, those in the accountability condition were first advised that their driving skills and accident risk would be later assessed via a driving simulator. Those in the insight condition first underwent a difficult computer-based hazard perception task designed to provide participants with insight into their potential limitations when responding to hazards in difficult and unpredictable driving situations. Participants in the control condition completed only the questionnaire. Results showed that the accountability manipulation was effective in reducing optimism bias in terms of participants’ comparative ratings of their accident risk in specific situations, though only for less experienced drivers. In contrast, among more experienced males, participants in the insight condition showed greater optimism bias for overall accident risk than their counterparts in the accountability or control groups. There were no effects of the manipulations on drivers’ skills ratings. The differential effects of the two types of manipulations on optimism bias relating to one’s accident risk in different subgroups of the young driver sample highlight the importance of targeting interventions for different levels of experience. Accountability interventions may be beneficial for less experienced young drivers but the results suggest exercising caution with the use of insight type interventions, particularly hazard perception style tasks, for more experienced young drivers typically still in the provisional stage of graduated licensing systems.
机译:这项研究旨在确定两种简短的低成本干预措施是否可以减少年轻驾驶员对驾驶技能和事故风险感知的乐观偏见。这种驾驶员认为自己比同龄人更熟练和更不易发生驾驶事故的趋势可能会导致较少参与预防性驾驶行为,而更多地参与更危险的驾驶行为。将243名年轻驾驶员(年龄17至25岁)随机分配到以下三个组之一:责任制,洞察力或控制力。所有参与者均提供了其驾驶技能和意外风险相对于典型年轻驾驶员的总体和具体情况评分。在完成调查表之前,首先要告知那些处于责任状态的人,他们的驾驶技能和事故风险将在稍后通过驾驶模拟器进行评估。处于有见识状态的人首先要进行基于计算机的困难危害感知任务,旨在让参与者在困难和不可预测的驾驶情况下应对危害时,了解其潜在的局限性。控制条件下的参与者仅填写问卷。结果表明,问责制操纵可以有效地减少参与者在特定情况下对其事故风险的相对评级,但对经验不足的驾驶员而言却比较乐观。相反,在经验丰富的男性中,有见识的参与者对总体事故风险的乐观偏见要大于问责制或对照组的同伴。这些操作对驾驶员的技能等级没有影响。在年轻驾驶员样本的不同亚组中,两种类型的操作对与事故风险相关的乐观偏见的不同影响突显了针对不同经验水平进行干预的重要性。问责干预措施对经验不足的年轻驾驶员可能是有益的,但结果表明,对于通常仍处于毕业许可系统临时阶段的经验丰富的年轻驾驶员,应使用洞察力型干预措施,尤其是危害感知方式的任务,要谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号