首页> 外文OA文献 >Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure : the Chronic Heart failure Assessment by Telephone (CHAT) study
【2h】

Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure : the Chronic Heart failure Assessment by Telephone (CHAT) study

机译:对农村和偏远地区心力衰竭患者的电话支持:电话慢性心力衰竭评估(CHAT)研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundududHeart failure (HF) remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality. We tested a telephone support strategy to reduce major events in rural and remote Australians with HF, who have limited healthcare access. Telephone support comprised an interactive telecommunication software tool (TeleWatch) with follow-up by trained cardiac nurses.ududMethodsududPatients with a general practice (GP) diagnosis of HF were randomised to usual care (UC) or UC and telephone support intervention (UC+I) using a cluster design involving 143 GPs throughout Australia. Patients were followed for 12 months. The primary end-point was the Packer clinical composite score. Secondary end-points included hospitalisation for any cause, death or hospitalisation, as well as HF hospitalisation.ududResultsududFour hundred and five patients were randomised into CHAT. Patients were well matched at baseline for key demographic variables. The primary end-point of the Packer Score was not different between the two groups (P=0.98), although more patients improved with UC+I. There were fewer patients hospitalised for any cause (74 versus 114, adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.50-0.89], p=0.006) and who died or were hospitalised (89 versus 124, adjusted HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53 – 0.92], p=0.011), in the UC+I vs UC group. HF hospitalisations were reduced with UC+I (23 versus 35, adjusted HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.44 – 1.38]), although this was not significant (p=0.43). There were 16 deaths in the UC group and 17 in the UC+I group (p=0.43).ududConclusionsududAlthough no difference was observed in the primary end-point of CHAT (Packer composite score), UC+I significantly reduced the number of HF patients hospitalised amongst a rural and remote cohort. These data suggest that telephone support may be an efficacious approach to improve clinical outcomes in rural and remote HF patients.
机译:背景 ud ud心脏衰竭(HF)仍然是高发病率和高死亡率的疾病。我们测试了一种电话支持策略,以减少在医疗保健有限的澳大利亚农村和偏远地区患有HF的重大事件。电话支持包括交互式电信软件工具(TeleWatch),并由受过训练的心脏护士进行随访。 ud udMethods ud ud具有普通科(GP)诊断HF的患者被随机分配到常规护理(UC)或UC和电话使用涉及整个澳大利亚143个GP的集群设计支持干预(UC + I)。随访患者12个月。主要终点是Packer临床综合评分。次要终点包括因任何原因,死亡或住院以及HF住院治疗。 ud ud结果 ud ud将405例患者随机分为CHAT。患者在基线时的主要人口统计学变量匹配良好。两组之间Packer评分的主要终点没有差异(P = 0.98),尽管有更多患者的UC + I改善了。因任何原因住院的患者较少(74比114,调整后的HR 0.67 [95%CI 0.50-0.89],p = 0.006),死亡或住院的患者较少(89比124,调整后的HR 0.70 [95%CI 0.53 – 0.92] ],p = 0.011),在UC + I与UC组中。 UC + I减少了心衰住院率(23比35,校正后的HR 0.81 [95%CI 0.44 – 1.38]),尽管这并不显着(p = 0.43)。 UC组中有16例死亡,UC + I组中有17例死亡(p = 0.43)。 ud ud结论 ud ud尽管在CHAT(包装综合评分),UC +的主要终点没有观察到差异我大大减少了农村和偏远地区住院的心衰患者的数量。这些数据表明,电话支持可能是改善农村和偏远HF患者临床结果的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号