首页> 外文OA文献 >A review of the effectiveness of speed control measures in roadwork zones
【2h】

A review of the effectiveness of speed control measures in roadwork zones

机译:道路施工区速度控制措施有效性的回顾

摘要

Noncompliance with speed limits is one of the major safety concerns in roadwork zones. Although numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of safety measures on speed limit compliance, many report inconsistent findings. This paper aims to review the effectiveness of four categories of roadwork zone speed control measures: Informational, Physical, Enforcement, and Educational measures. While informational measures (static signage, variable message signage) evidently have small to moderate effects on speed reduction, physical measures (rumble strips, optical speed bars) are found ineffective for transient and moving work zones. Enforcement measures (speed camera, police presence) have the greatest effects, while educational measures also have significant potential to improve public awareness of roadworker safety and to encourage slower speeds in work zones. Inadequate public understanding of roadwork risks and hazards, failure to notice signs, and poor appreciation of safety measures are the major causes of noncompliance with speed limits.
机译:不遵守速度限制是道路施工区域的主要安全问题之一。尽管许多研究试图评估安全措施对限速遵守的有效性,但许多研究报告不一致。本文旨在回顾道路施工区四类速度控制措施的有效性:信息,物理,执法和教育措施。尽管信息措施(静态标牌,可变消息标牌)显然对减速有较小至中等的影响,但发现物理措施(隆隆带,光学速度标尺)对瞬态和移动工作区域无效。执法措施(高速摄影机,警察在场)具有最大的作用,而教育措施也具有极大的潜力,可以提高公众对道路施工人员安全的认识,并鼓励工作区的速度降低。公众对道路施工风险和危害的认识不足,未注意标志以及对安全措施的理解不充分是导致未遵守速度限制的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号