首页> 外文OA文献 >Networked governance or just networks? Local governance of the knowledge economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden)
【2h】

Networked governance or just networks? Local governance of the knowledge economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden)

机译:网络化治理还是仅网络?利默里克(爱尔兰)和卡尔斯克鲁纳(瑞典)的知识经济地方治理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There is a widespread view that the globalisation of economic activity and the growth of the knowledge economy are associated with a rescaling (from national/central to local/proximate) and reframing (from hierarchies/control to networks/exchange) of economic governance. The emergence of networked governance of knowledge activities is portrayed as one component of a more general shift from government to governance. This paper suggests that a distinction can be drawn between networks and networked governance and provides some insights into the indicators that might help distinguish networked governance from networks. The distinction is applied empirically to emerging forms of local networks in ICT in Limerick and Karlskrona. Differences between the two regions can be conceptualised with reference to the governance role of local networks in steering, setting directions and influencing behaviour. The paper identifies the characteristics of network arrangements that appear to be necessary for governance objectives to be satisfied; these are density, breadth and association with values such as trust, mutuality and shared identity. The paper shows that there is a need to approach generalised theories of emerging models of governance with sensitivity to cross-regional variations around these characteristics. Claims regarding the emergence of new forms of governance in local spaces may be exaggerated if all types of network arrangements are taken as evidence of a transformation from government to governance.
机译:人们普遍认为,经济活动的全球化和知识经济的增长与经济治理的重新调整(从国家/中央到地方/邻近)和重新设计(从等级/控制到网络/交换)有关。知识活动的网络化治理的出现被描绘为从政府到治理的更广泛转变的一个组成部分。本文建议可以在网络和网络治理之间进行区分,并对可以帮助区分网络治理和网络的指标提供一些见解。该区别在经验上适用于利默里克和卡尔斯克鲁纳的ICT中新兴的本地网络形式。可以参考本地网络在指导,设定方向和影响行为方面的管理角色来概念化两个区域之间的差异。本文确定了网络安排的特征,这些特征对于实现治理目标似乎是必需的;这些是密​​度,广度以及与诸如信任,互助和共享身份之类的价值观的关联。本文表明,有必要采用新兴治理模型的广义理论,并对这些特征周围的跨区域变化保持敏感。如果将所有类型的网络安排都视为从政府到治理的转变的证据,那么关于在地方空间出现新治理形式的主张可能会被夸大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Parker Rachel L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号