首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two suspension control strategies for multi-axle heavy truck
【2h】

Comparison of two suspension control strategies for multi-axle heavy truck

机译:多轴重型卡车两种悬架控制策略的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two simple and effective control strategies for a multi-axle heavy truck, modified skyhook damping (MSD) control and proportional-integration-derivative (PID) control, were implemented into functional virtual prototype (FVP) model and compared in terms of road friendliness and ride comfort. A four-axle heavy truck-road coupling system model was established using FVP technology and validated through a ride comfort test. Then appropriate passive air suspensions were chosen to replace the rear tandem suspensions of the original truck model for preliminary optimization. The mechanical properties and time lag of dampers were taken into account in simulations of MSD and PID semi-active dampers implemented using MATLAB/Simulink. Through co-simulations with Adams and MATLAB, the effects of semi-active MSD and PID control were analyzed and compared, and control parameters which afforded the best comprehensive performance for each control strategy were chosen. Simulation results indicate that compared with the passive air suspension truck, semi-active MSD control improves both ride comfort and road-friendliness markedly, with optimization ratios of RMS vertical acceleration and RMS tyre force ranging from 10.1% to 44.8%. However, semi-active PID control only reduces vertical vibration of the driver’s seat by 11.1%, 11.1% and 10.9% on A, B and C level roads respectively. Both strategies are robust to the variation of road level.
机译:将多轴重型卡车的两种简单有效的控制策略,即改进的天钩阻尼(MSD)控制和比例积分微分(PID)控制,实施到功能虚拟原型(FVP)模型中,并在道路友好性和稳定性方面进行了比较。乘坐舒适。使用FVP技术建立了四轴重型卡车-公路联轴器系统模型,并通过乘坐舒适性测试进行了验证。然后选择适当的被动空气悬架来代替原始卡车模型的后排串联悬架,以进行初步优化。在使用MATLAB / Simulink进行的MSD和PID半主动阻尼器的仿真中考虑了阻尼器的机械性能和时滞。通过与Adams和MATLAB的联合仿真,分析和比较了半主动MSD和PID控制的效果,并为每种控制策略选择了能提供最佳综合性能的控制参数。仿真结果表明,与被动式空气悬挂卡车相比,半主动式MSD控制显着改善了乘坐舒适性和道路友好性,RMS垂直加速度和RMS轮胎力的优化比率在10.1%至44.8%之间。但是,半主动PID控制只能分别在A,B和C级道路上将驾驶员座椅的垂直振动降低11.1%,11.1%和10.9%。两种策略对于道路水平的变化都是鲁棒的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号