首页> 外文OA文献 >Are academics messy? Testing the broken windows theory with a field experiment in the work environment
【2h】

Are academics messy? Testing the broken windows theory with a field experiment in the work environment

机译:学者凌乱吗?在工作环境中通过现场实验测试破窗理论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We test the broken windows theory using a field experiment in a shared area of an academic workplace(the department common room). More specifically, we explore academics’ and postgraduate students’ behavior under an order condition (a clean environment) and a disorder condition (a messy environment). We find strong evidence that signs of disorderly behavior trigger littering: In 59% of the cases, subjects litter in the disorder treatment as compared to 18% in the order condition. These results remain robust in a multivariate analysis even when controlling for a large set of factors not directly examined by previous studies. Overall, when academic staff and postgraduate students observe that others have violated the social norm of keeping the common room clean, all else being equal, the probability of littering increases by around 40%.
机译:我们在学术工作区(部门公共休息室)的共享区域中使用现场实验测试了破窗理论。更具体地说,我们在有秩序的条件(干净的环境)和无序的条件(混乱的环境)下探索学者和研究生的行为。我们发现有力的证据表明,行为异常的行为会触发乱抛垃圾:在59%的病例中,受试者在乱序乱抛垃圾中乱丢垃圾,而在有秩序的情况下为18%。这些结果在多变量分析中仍然很可靠,即使控制了先前研究未直接检查的大量因素也是如此。总体而言,当学术人员和研究生发现其他人违反了保持公共休息室整洁的社会规范时,在其他条件相同的情况下,乱扔垃圾的可能性增加了约40%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramos Joao; Torgler Benno;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:48:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号