首页> 外文OA文献 >Inalienable Rights, Legal Enforceability, and American Constitutions: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Concept of Unenumerated Rights
【2h】

Inalienable Rights, Legal Enforceability, and American Constitutions: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Concept of Unenumerated Rights

机译:不可剥夺的权利,法律可执行性和美国宪法:第十四修正案和未列举权利的概念

摘要

It has become common to believe that those who ratified the Fourteenth Amendment “incorporated” not only the specific guarantees of the federal Bill of Rights, but also the other fundamental rights “retained by the people” in the Ninth Amendment. Even among those who acknowledge that the Ninth Amendment was originally a “federalism” provision that simply “retained” all that had not been granted as “powers” to the federal government are those who contend that, in light of the adoption of similar provisions in the state constitutions, by 1866 this language had become a free-floating affirmation of unenumerated rights. This Article attempts to show that the state constitutional equivalents of the Ninth Amendment were not understood as stating limitations on state powers and that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to prevent the kind of discrimination that would “abridge” the rights of citizens, but not to guarantee unenumerated fundamental rights.
机译:人们普遍认为,那些批准第十四条修正案的人不仅将《联邦权利法案》的具体保障纳入了《宪法》,而且还将《人民保留的其他基本权利》纳入了《第九条修正案》。甚至那些承认第九修正案原本是“联邦制”条款的人,只是简单地“保留”了所有未授予联邦政府“权力”的人,还是那些认为根据《宪法》通过类似条款的人。根据国家宪法,到1866年,这种语言已成为未列举权利的自由浮动的确认。本条试图表明,《宪法》第九条的等效形式并未被理解为对国家权力的限制,并且《宪法第十四条》的目的是防止那种会“剥夺”公民权利的歧视,但并不旨在保证公民的权利。未列举的基本权利。

著录项

  • 作者

    McAffee Thomas B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"de","name":"German","id":7}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号