首页> 外文OA文献 >The Irish survey of student engagement: A comparative analysis with international surveys of student engagement.
【2h】

The Irish survey of student engagement: A comparative analysis with international surveys of student engagement.

机译:爱尔兰学生参与度调查:与国际学生参与度调查的比较分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to Coates (2010), measuring engagement can provide a means to develop a fuller understanding of the student experience above and beyond that ascertained through student satisfaction surveys. To examine this topic further, this research analyses the Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) and compares it to similar surveys of student engagement from other countries. The surveys deal with student engagement, rather than satisfaction and are modelled on the first such survey used in the United States and Canada, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). The underpinning design decisions for the NSSE is based on the premise that what students do during college counts more in terms of desired outcomes than who they are or event where they go to college (Kuh, 2001). The development of the NSSE was based on Chickering and Gameson’s (1987) seven practices in undergraduate education and other instruments that measured the student experience.udIn Ireland, the National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030 (HEA, 2011) recommended that every Irish higher education institution should put in place a comprehensive anonymous student feedback system, coupled with structures to ensure that action is taken promptly in relation to student concerns. This brought about the Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) and the central objective of this project is to develop a valuable source of information about students’ experiences of higher education in Ireland by asking students themselves.udThis paper aims to address the question: how does the Irish Survey of Student Engagement compare to other such surveys and is it achieving what it set out to do? The researcher proposes recommendations for improving the Irish Survey of Student Engagement and explores alternative options to measuring student engagement.udThe methodology employed is secondary research of the actual surveys used elsewhere and related academic journal articles on this topic. The research explores the background and context of the surveys and provides an overview of each. Throughout the paper, the local experience at the researcher’s Irish higher education institute is considered and used to support claims made, where possible.udThe surveys of student engagement have immense value and encourage a participation rate that could not be replicated through qualitative means. With some more rigid approaches and a combination of other methodological possibilities, the Irish survey could be more comparable internationally, but this may not be of great importance. Of utmost importance is comparisons of institutions within a country and due to the latitude given to institutions in how they participate, this is not always possible. This merits attention and a more cohesive approach should be developed in order address the important underpinning rationale for the research, to give students a voice and to improve student engagement.
机译:根据Coates(2010)的研究,衡量参与度可以提供一种方法,使学生对通过学生满意度调查确定的学习体验有更全面的了解。为了进一步研究该主题,本研究分析了爱尔兰学生参与度调查(ISSE),并将其与其他国家的类似学生参与度调查进行了比较。这些调查是针对学生敬业度而不是满意度的,并以美国和加拿大使用的首个此类调查为模型,即国家学生参与度调查(NSSE)。 NSSE的基础设计决策是基于这样一个前提,即在大学期间,学生要做的事比预期的结果要重要,而不是他们是谁或上大学的事件(Kuh,2001年)。 NSSE的发展是基于Chickering和Gameon(1987)在本科教育中的七种实践以及衡量学生体验的其他工具。 ud在爱尔兰,《到2030年的国家高等教育战略》(HEA,2011年)建议爱尔兰的每一个教育机构应建立全面的匿名学生反馈系统,并建立结构以确保针对学生的关注及时采取行动。这带来了爱尔兰学生参与度调查(ISSE),该项目的主要目标是通过询问学生自己来开发有关爱尔兰学生高等教育经历的宝贵信息。 ud本文旨在解决以下问题:爱尔兰学生参与度调查与其他此类调查相比如何?它实现了计划要做的事情吗?研究人员提出了改进爱尔兰学生参与度调查的建议,并探索了衡量学生参与度的替代方法。 ud所采用的方法是对其他地方使用的实际调查以及有关该主题的相关学术期刊文章的二次研究。该研究探索了调查的背景和背景,并提供了每个调查的概述。整篇论文都考虑了研究人员在爱尔兰高等教育机构中的本地经验,并在可能的情况下用于支持提出的主张。 ud学生敬业度调查具有巨大价值,并鼓励无法通过定性手段复制的参与率。通过一些更严格的方法以及其他方法上的可能性,爱尔兰的调查在国际上可能更具可比性,但这可能并不重要。最重要的是比较一个国家内的机构,并且由于机构参与方式的自由度,这并非总是可能的。值得关注的是,应该开发一种更具凝聚力的方法,以解决该研究的重要基础原理,使学生有发言权并提高学生的参与度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carty John.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号