首页> 外文OA文献 >Qualitative comparison of techniques for evaluating performance of short term power system reliability management.
【2h】

Qualitative comparison of techniques for evaluating performance of short term power system reliability management.

机译:用于评估短期电力系统可靠性管理性能的技术的定性比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adequate performance evaluation of different shortudterm reliability management approaches and criteria is crucialudin order to convince transmission system operators to substituteudor complement the currently used N-1 criterion with more effi-udcient, alternative approaches. This paper qualitatively comparesudexisting evaluation techniques. These techniques are also appliedudin other contexts, such as reliability assessment, which haveudsimilarities with performance evaluation, but differ in someudcrucial aspects. Evaluation techniques typically make a trade-offudbetween accuracy, complexity and computational burden. Easyto-use,udnon-sequential, analytical state enumeration techniquesudcan be useful to obtain indicative results. More computationallyudintensive, sequential simulation techniques are on the other handudbetter suited for in depth analysis, as they allow to take intoudaccount the dynamic character of the decision making processudunder evaluation. Emulation seems promising from a theoreticaludperspective, but handling the complex, multi-dimensional natureudof short term reliability management is a challenge.
机译:为了说服传输系统运营商用更有效,更替代的方法替代/补充当前使用的N-1标准,至关重要的是,必须对不同的短期/短期可靠性管理方法和标准进行充分的性能评估。本文定性地比较了 uxisting评价技术。这些技术还可以在其他情况下应用,例如可靠性评估,这些性能与性能评估有相似之处,但在某些关键方面却有所不同。评估技术通常会在准确性,复杂性和计算负担之间进行权衡。易于使用的 udnon顺序分析状态枚举技术 ud对于获得指示性结果可能很有用。另一方面,更多的计算密集型顺序仿真技术较适合于深度分析,因为它们可以考虑评估决策过程的动态特性评估不足。从理论/角度来看,仿真似乎很有希望,但是处理短期可靠性管理的复杂,多维性质/ ud是一个挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号