首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Very positive’ or ‘vague and detached’? Unpacking ambiguities in further education teachers’ responses to professional standards in England.
【2h】

‘Very positive’ or ‘vague and detached’? Unpacking ambiguities in further education teachers’ responses to professional standards in England.

机译:“非常积极”或“模糊而超脱”?在英格兰继续教育教师对专业标准的回应中消除歧义。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During the last two decades, a number of successive policy initiatives have attempted to professionalise the further education sector in England: professional qualifications have been rewritten, made compulsory and then returned to voluntary status; professional bodies have been established, briefly promoted, and then neglected; professional licences have been considered and rejected; and a new professional status has been introduced. This article, which combines both theoretical and empirical perspectives, argues that all of these processes of professionalisation are problematic due to the inherent flaws in any set of professional standards, and that the ambiguous manner in which the latest set of professional standards is being read and understood by practitioners within the sector reflects a continuation of a flawed process of professionalisation in further education that has been underway since 1999.
机译:在过去的二十年中,一系列连续的政策举措试图使英格兰的继续教育部门专业化:专业资格已被重写,强制性然后又恢复了自愿地位;已经建立了专业机构,对其进行了短暂的提升,然后被忽视了;已经考虑并拒绝了专业执照;并且引入了新的专业地位。本文结合了理论和经验的观点,认为所有这些专业化过程都是有问题的,这是由于任何一套专业标准中都存在固有的缺陷,以及阅读和使用最新专业标准的模棱两可的方式。该部门从业人员的理解反映了自1999年以来一直在进行的有缺陷的继续教育专业化过程的延续。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tummons, J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号