首页> 外文OA文献 >Selecting cases for in-depth study from a survey dataset : an application of Ragin's configurational methods.
【2h】

Selecting cases for in-depth study from a survey dataset : an application of Ragin's configurational methods.

机译:从调查数据集中选择要进行深入研究的案例:Ragin的配置方法的应用。

摘要

While ‘establishing the phenomena’, to use Merton’s phrase, is an important part of the sociological enterprise, in then accounting for such empirical regularities, theoretical models are required to understand causal processes. Both regression analysis and configurational methods applied to large datasets can establish patterns of relationships. Following a realist view, we assume that causal mechanisms have generated such patterns, and sound theoretical models are required to understand them. In-depth case studies can contribute to advancing such causal knowledge. We describe how, in the particular context of the configurational mode of analysis that characterises Ragin’s Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), we have selected individuals for in-depth study with the eventual purpose of advancing causal or explanatory understanding of conjunctural empirical regularities concerning educational careers. While forms of regression analysis seek to establish the net effects of ‘independent’ variables, QCA, employing Boolean algebra, analyses the conjunctions of conditions sufficient and/or necessary for an outcome to occur. QCA aims to preserve, holistically, the features of cases and is therefore well-suited to case selection. We use QCA both to undertake an initial large scale cross-case analysis and to subsequently select cases to develop theoretical understanding via within-case analysis. Using QCA’s measures of consistency with relations of sufficiency and necessity, we can classify cases as typical and deviant, with these two types of cases playing different roles in testing and developing theory. Drawing on analyses of the German SOEP dataset undertaken as part of a larger study which is applying case-based configurational methods to English and German survey datasets while undertaking subsequent in-depth interviews with selected cases, we demonstrate how QCA can be used to select cases for interview in a systematic and theoretically informed manner.
机译:用默顿的话来说,“建立现象”是社会学事业的重要组成部分,在解释这种经验规律性时,需要理论模型来理解因果关系过程。应用于大型数据集的回归分析和配置方法都可以建立关系模式。按照现实主义的观点,我们假设因果机制已经产生了这种模式,并且需要合理的理论模型来理解它们。深入的案例研究可以促进这种因果知识的发展。我们描述了在表征拉金定性比较分析(QCA)的特定配置分析模式的特定背景下,我们如何选择个人进行深入研究,最终目的是促进对与教育职业有关的结合经验规律性的因果关系或解释性理解。回归分析的形式试图建立“独立”变量的净效应,而QCA采用布尔代数,分析了结果发生时充分和/或必要的条件的结合。 QCA旨在从整体上保留案例的特征,因此非常适合案例选择。我们使用QCA进行初始的大规模跨案例分析,然后选择案例以通过案例内分析发展理论理解。使用QCA的一致性和必要性关系的度量,我们可以将案例分类为典型案例和异常案例,这两种类型的案例在检验和发展理论中起着不同的作用。利用作为大型研究的一部分进行的德国SOEP数据集的分析,该分析将基于案例的配置方法应用于英语和德语调查数据集,同时对选定的案例进行后续的深入访谈,我们演示了如何使用QCA来选择案例以系统的和理论上合理的方式进行面试。

著录项

  • 作者

    Glaesser J.; Cooper B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号