首页> 外文OA文献 >Interrogating scarcity : how to think about ‘resource-scarce settings’.
【2h】

Interrogating scarcity : how to think about ‘resource-scarce settings’.

机译:质疑稀缺性:如何思考“资源稀缺的环境”。

摘要

The idea of resource scarcity permeates health ethics and health policy analysis in various contexts. However, health ethics inquiry seldom asks—as it should—why some settings are ‘resource-scarce’ and others not. In this article I describe interrogating scarcity as a strategy for inquiry into questions of resource allocation within a single political jurisdiction and, in particular, as an approach to the issue of global health justice in an interconnected world. I demonstrate its relevance to the situation of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with brief descriptions of four elements of contemporary globalization: trade agreements; the worldwide financial marketplace and capital flight; structural adjustment; imperial geopolitics and foreign policy. This demonstration involves not only health care, but also social determinants of health. Finally, I argue that interrogating scarcity provides the basis for a new, critical approach to health policy at the interface of ethics and the social sciences, with specific reference to market fundamentalism as the value system underlying contemporary globalization.
机译:在各种情况下,资源稀缺的概念渗透到健康伦理和健康政策分析中。但是,健康伦理查询很少(应该如此)询问为什么某些设置是“资源稀缺”的,而其他设置则不是。在本文中,我将询问稀缺性描述为一种在单一政治管辖区内调查资源分配问题的策略,尤其是作为一种在相互联系的世界中解决全球卫生正义问题的方法。我简要介绍了当代全球化的四个要素:贸易协定;低收入国家和中等收入国家的状况,以此证明其与中低收入国家的相关性。全球金融市场和资本外逃;结构调整;帝国地缘政治和外交政策。该示范不仅涉及医疗保健,还涉及健康的社会决定因素。最后,我认为,质疑稀缺性是在伦理学和社会科学的界面上为卫生政策提出一种新的,批判性方法的基础,特别是将市场原教旨主义作为当代全球化的价值体系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schrecker Ted;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号