首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based policy and practice : examples from systematic reviews of literature.
【2h】

Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based policy and practice : examples from systematic reviews of literature.

机译:在基于证据的政策和实践中评估证据:来自系统文献综述的实例。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the push for evidence-informed policy and practice, schools and policy makers are now increasingly encouraged and supported to use and enagage with research evidence. This means that consumers of research will now need to be discerning in judging the quality of research evidence that will inform their decisions. This paper evaluates the quality of evidence behind some well-known education programmes using examples from previous reviews of over 5,000 studies on a range of topics. It shows that much of the evidence is weak, and fundamental flaws in research are not uncommon. This is a serious problem if teaching practices and important policy decisions are made based on such flawed evidence. Lives may be damaged and opportunities missed. The aim of this paper is to show how widespread this problem is and to suggest ways by which the quality of education research may be improved. For example, funders of research and research bodies need to insist on quality research and fund only those that meet the minimum quality criteria. Journal editors and reviewers need to be cognizant of fundamental flaws in research and reject such submissions. One way to do this is to encourage submission of the research design and research protocol prior to acceptance, so acceptance or rejection is based on the design and not on the outcomes. This helps prevent publication bias and biased reporting. Individual researchers can improve quality by making it their moral responsibility to be truthful and transparent.
机译:随着循证信息政策和实践的推动,学校和决策者现在越来越受到鼓励和支持,以使用和参与研究证据。这意味着研究的消费者现在需要在判断将为他们的决定提供依据的研究证据的质量时要有所区分。本文使用以前对5,000多个主题研究的评论中的例子,评估了一些知名教育计划背后的证据质量。它表明许多证据是薄弱的,研究中的基本缺陷并不少见。如果根据这些有缺陷的证据制定教学实践和重要的政策决策,这将是一个严重的问题。生命可能遭到破坏,机会错失了。本文的目的是说明这个问题的普遍性,并提出提高教育研究质量的方法。例如,研究和研究机构的资助者需要坚持进行高质量的研究,仅资助那些符合最低质量标准的研究。期刊编辑和审稿人需要意识到研究中的基本缺陷,并拒绝此类投稿。一种方法是鼓励在接受之前提交研究设计和研究方案,因此接受或拒绝是基于设计而不是结果。这有助于防止发布偏差和报告偏差。个体研究人员可以通过诚实和透明来承担道德责任,从而提高质量。

著录项

  • 作者

    See B.H.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号